Offical National Championship Game

by **b_caesar** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:38 pm

Dutch wrote:
b_caesar wrote:Here's hoping we'll have more than 5 cheerleaders at the next home BB game, too...
there's a limit of 1 per 100 fans. so not happening.

The announced attendance was about 2000 at the Ole Miss game last week...maybe it's a pep band member ratio - there were maybe 10 in that well-intentioned, but puny, alumni band.

by **b_caesar** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:40 pm

Stallion wrote:here is the CUSA message board link that also has the link and background

http://ncaabbs.com/showthread.php?tid=474745

Interesting additional quotes on that thread, too...

by **skyscraper** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:41 pm

Stallion wrote:here is the CUSA message board link that also has the link and background

http://ncaabbs.com/showthread.php?tid=474745

Some interesting chatter about any UMemphis connections w/the Liberty Bowl that may or may not make a difference for C-USA being forced out.

by **b_caesar** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:45 pm

Well, we know who ESPN favors in this game, having two SEC coaches in Urban Meyer and Nick Saban break down the game during halftime ... what, was Jim Harbaugh not available?

by **smupony94** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:48 pm

Dirty pool

by **b_caesar** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:16 pm

Okay, now I'm really rooting for Oregon. If only for the dirty play by the Tigers D.

by **smupony94** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:17 pm

b_caesar wrote:Okay, now I'm really rooting for Oregon. If only for the dirty play by the Tigers D.

Dirty pool

by **HB Pony Dad** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:26 pm

This is like watching someone being constricted by a Python.

This really smacks of how sucky voting teams into a game is instead of a true playoff.

MEH!

by **RE Tycoon** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:32 pm

skyscraper wrote:
Some interesting chatter about any UMemphis connections w/the Liberty Bowl that may or may not make a difference for C-USA being forced out.

Cool picture in your signature.

by **b_caesar** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:34 pm

HB Pony Dad wrote:This is like watching someone being constricted by a Python.

This really smacks of how sucky voting teams into a game is instead of a true playoff.

MEH!

It's not over yet...

by **RE Tycoon** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:35 pm

Stallion wrote:SMU needs to give Cheerleader scholarships like TCU and make them hit the GYM.

Is this the difference? If so, I want to divert my MC donation to this cause asap. Our lack of attractive cheerleaders is one of the most daunting issues facing this great institution. Seeing Oregon's unbelievable talent has made me even more eager to rectify this situation.

by **Stallion** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:39 pm

I've posted stories a couple of times from local newspapers stating that girls had signed a Cheerleader Letter of Intent to go to TCU. Might have been false info but if you go to TCU Cheer/Pom Pom site and read their bios they are all 10-15 year vets in gymnastics/dance etc.

by **RE Tycoon** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:42 pm

Whatever they are doing is working.

by **Dutch** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:44 pm

RE Tycoon wrote:Whatever they are doing is working.

winning football games. that's what they're doing. cheerleaders want to be on TV, they want to be associated with a winning team, just like all students. they want to be associated with a winner.

win and it will all follow.

by **RE Tycoon** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:49 pm

So your saying this is the Field of Dreams?