The Daily Campus Editorial, July 6, 2005

by **NavyCrimson** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:36 pm

as for ND, when h%^&& freezes over! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

they are one of the few intelligent teams who know how to market besides the tea-sips

by **ALEX LIFESON** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:10 pm

I heard Notre Dame was putting touchdown Jesus on their helmet?

by **PlanoStang** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:36 pm

HixsontoLeVias wrote:...the Raiders and the Chiefs are changing also, heard Norte Dame will be putting ND on a white helmet next year...why don't we go back to the Ricky Wesson / Keith Bobo days of the silver, no Mustang helmet?? Long Live Russ Potts.

Yeah, and I hope ND says Notre Dame in that COOL looking UNT 'North
Texas' script. :roll:

What the h*ll did they do with that decal they used
to use in their Hayden Fry days.

I wondered why we didn't put a blue or red running Mustang on those
silver helmets from the Dave Smith era? I think he was under delusions
that we were the new Ohio State. :lol:

by **that's great raplh** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:09 pm

i say again

this sucks and blows

by **giacfsp** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:56 am

Stallion wrote:I hear the Cowboys are changing their logo to a shooting star to give it that cool modern look the kids love so much!

Now that is funny. Even Jerry's not that dumb.

by **DixieTech** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 6:33 am

Jerry Jones is not dumb, he's a great owner. From an unbiased observer, the new thing looks crappy. Y'all already sport a clean, classic-looking logo, why screw it up?

by **EastStang** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:01 am

NFL teams do change logos. The Redskins have had several different looks before the Joe Gibbs model became the standard. (Burgundy helmet with the Redskin logo). I remember the Vince Lombardi model was a gold helmet with a big burgundy "R" on it with feathers (looked awful). He liked the Green Bay helmet style and recreated it for the Redskins.

by **CalallenStang** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:10 am

the "Morning-After Pill" piece was written June 6, 2005

http://www.smudailycampus.com/vnews/dis ... _archive=1

See if you can find this Ed piece in the archives...

http://www.smudailycampus.com/vnews/dis ... l#sections

by **jtstang** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:04 am

I'll say this, any M.D. who refuses to prescibe an FDA-approved medication on personal belief grounds ought to have their license pulled. The medical community is outraged every time some parent refuses treatment for a sick kid based on religious beliefs--the road should go both ways.

by **CalallenStang** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:05 am

jtstang wrote:I'll say this, any M.D. who refuses to prescibe an FDA-approved medication on personal belief grounds ought to have their license pulled. The medical community is outraged every time some parent refuses treatment for a sick kid based on religious beliefs--the road should go both ways.

I agree wholeheartedly

But still...where is this Ed piece? Is it even real, or are we being deceived?

by **MustangSally** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:12 am

Ugh, reading through some archived stuff just makes me angrier. Most of these Ed Board things are unresearched ramblings that try to make a point like "SMU should have better ____" but never really stating how or even showing that SMU doesn't want to be better.

Here's a good example: http://www.smudailycampus.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/03/05/4048020a74544?in_archive=1
"SMU needs to find a young and ambitious bball coach"..."We already had our chance to get Bobby Knight"...hmmm, we need a young coach like Bobby Knight, wtf? I also like the comments about "unlike Dement, we need someone who isn't afraid to recruit big time players". Gee, Dement must have been scared to talk to anyone good, had nothing to do with 1950's facilities, dismal fan support, etc. Totally uninformed, rambles on about how we need a coach that can make a conference change? And to become a bigtime program we need a tougher schedule? Yeah, that helped us in football the fall before this was written when an NCAA record was set AGAINSt us in the Ok State game. Just whining, that's all this is. How quickly they ignore that Dement brought several winning seasons to the Hilltop after the Shumate era and had respectable graduation rates.

by **CalallenStang** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:20 am

Let's call this thread "Find every problem with the Daily Campus" since there seems to be no editorial piece listed that this thread is supposed to refer to.

Sally, just out of your article...

"Copeland needs to focus his search toward an up-and-comer coach"
then they say...
"There is definitely another Knight out there."

Is it just me, or was Knight already established?

by **Grider** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:25 am

CalallenStang wrote:Let's call this thread "Find every problem with the Daily Campus" since there seems to be no editorial piece listed that this thread is supposed to refer to.

I don't know, the morning after pill and the new logo are essentially both abortions.

by **KnuckleStang** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:25 am

Grider wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:Let's call this thread "Find every problem with the Daily Campus" since there seems to be no editorial piece listed that this thread is supposed to refer to.

I don't know, the morning after pill and the new logo are essentially both abortions.

Hiyo!

by **Stallion** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:27 am

I hear that Rice University is thinking of changing its name and all of its logos to reduce the negative connotations of "Rice" as a result of the "low-carb" craze

The Daily Campus Editorial, July 6, 2005

Where is the Ed piece?

Who is online