final rankings

by **The PonyGrad** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:39 am

BUTitan wrote:I really can't see how SMU is ranked over BU. Both of us went 5-6, but SMU is in a much weaker conference and BU beat you at your HOME!!! Man I can't wait to beat TCU next year to boost our ratings.

P.S. Don't get me wrong I think SMU could beat BU if we played today.

Geez, one place different? Why worry about it?

by **PonyPride** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:43 am

BUTitan wrote:I really can't see how SMU is ranked over BU. Both of us went 5-6, but SMU is in a much weaker conference and BU beat you at your HOME!!! Man I can't wait to beat TCU next year to boost our ratings.

P.S. Don't get me wrong I think SMU could beat BU if we played today.

To be honest, I've never liked Baylor much. But I'll be a big BU fan when your guys line up against TCU!

by **DixieTech** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:00 pm

Agreed. Admittedly, TCU is fast -- really fast -- and better than I'd like to admit. However, out of the other 24 teams on that list, if they played on a neutral field, I'd bet on the Frogs against:
UCLA, Wisconsin (maybe), Texas Tech (definitely) and Cal. Oklahoma would beat them in a re-match.

We would pound the frogs this year. We pounded them last year, and we will pound them next year in Ft.Worth with a partisan Tech crowd. Just a comment.

Their win over ISU was a good one though, although ISU is not exactly a powerhouse in the XII.

by **BUTitan** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:17 pm

I honestly think this TCU team could be the most overated team in the history of college football. I mean they are better than Baylor and all but top 10? Come on they barely beat ISU.

by **Buckethead** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:22 pm

At this point in SMU football history no team that we beat should be in the top 10.

by **SMUstang** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:59 pm

SMU Football Blog wrote:SMU is ranked above four of the six teams it lost, too.

On the other hand, SMU is ranked lower than 4 of the teams it beat. TCU, UTEP, UAB, and Houston.

Go figure

by **SMUstang** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:03 pm

SMUstang wrote:
SMU Football Blog wrote:SMU is ranked above four of the six teams it lost, too.

On the other hand, SMU is ranked lower than 4 of the teams it beat. TCU, UTEP, UAB, and Houston.

Go figure

Is the glass half full or half empty?

by **LonghornFan68** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:18 pm

SMUstang wrote:
SMUstang wrote:
SMU Football Blog wrote:SMU is ranked above four of the six teams it lost, too.

On the other hand, SMU is ranked lower than 4 of the teams it beat. TCU, UTEP, UAB, and Houston.

Go figure

Is the glass half full or half empty?

I dunno, but it's a weird statistic nonetheless.

by **smulite** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:01 pm

I agree that TCU has to be the most overrated team in NCAA history, And I'm glad to see that VA Tech is ranked 3rd in that pole.

final rankings

Who is online