SMU athletes shine in NCAA APR Report

by **ponyplayer** » Fri May 04, 2007 9:08 am

couch 'em wrote:academics: better than average
athletics: worse than average

Sounds like some people need to spend a little less time hitting the books and a little more time earning their scholarship.

the majority of SMU athletics is better than average........some people need to spend a litlle more time raising their IQs...................

by **PonySnob** » Fri May 04, 2007 9:19 am

ponyplayer wrote:the majority of SMU athletics is better than average.

Hard to say that the two most visible sports - football and men's basketball are better than "average".....based on their records the last few years.................. :roll:

by **jtstang** » Fri May 04, 2007 9:35 am

Is equestrian left off because the NCAA has not figured out how to measure the IQ of the horses?

by **ponyplayer** » Fri May 04, 2007 9:56 am

they left it off because their coach just resigned........I think five of the horses are running in the Kentucky Derby this weekend.......

by **mrydel** » Fri May 04, 2007 9:58 am

jtstang wrote:Is equestrian left off because the NCAA has not figured out how to measure the IQ of the horses?

It is measured in "hands".

by **jtstang** » Fri May 04, 2007 10:24 am

mrydel wrote:
jtstang wrote:Is equestrian left off because the NCAA has not figured out how to measure the IQ of the horses?

It is measured in "hands".

I'm assuming each of the chicks riding have two. The horses have none.

SMU athletes shine in NCAA APR Report

Who is online