Chan Gailey offered?

by **mrydel** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:08 pm

If the players' meeting report is correct, then it is not Gailey. He is not still coaching.

by **NavyCrimson** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:09 pm

Have to admit you do have a point on this one SMUMan02. "Mangy program"

by **jtstang** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:10 pm

Every GT grad I talked to (one), says he sucks and we can have him.

by **PonyDoh** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:18 pm

Chan's time at Ga Tech was moderately successful, but much of the credit belongs to Jon Tenuta, his extremely high paid d coordinator. Tenuta commanded 500K+ and didn't have to recruit. Gailey minus Tenuta is a horrible hire, and Tenuta isn't coming

by **PonyDogg** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:46 pm

The UGA fans would hate this hire. We should like it if it happens.

by **jimhagle** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:59 pm

He lacks any charisma which is something we could use around here. He can coach but as we all remember he was hardly quotable.

by **ponyboy** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:03 pm

jtstang wrote: You and everybody else who has at the top of your list of coaching credentials "good christian ethical man" can kiss my @ss. I don't want to suck for another twenty years because SMU did not have the balls to hire the best COACH because he has a couple of skeletons in his closet.

Agreed that we hire the best coach available as long as his past doesn't affect what he does here. But surely you're not suggesting that we eliminate a coach simply because he's a good guy? That we go out of our way to hire a scumbag because scumbags win more than good guys?

by **Dwan** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:14 pm

I think Chan is hard for a lot of Cowboys fans to accept. The guy is a former NFL head coach who was won consistently in a BCS conference at a school that has high academic standards. Comparing his resume to Bennett, Cavan, and Rossley is night and day.

by **SMU Football Blog** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:16 pm

mustang91 wrote:Reliable source says Chan Gailey was offered SMU job this morining and is thinking? Would not post it if it didn't have credence. Source outside of SMU athletics, but in the football industry.

Why do you think I started this thread? Have I ever started such a thread before? No. Why do you think Ted Gangi started a nearly identical thread at Mustangmaniacs at the same time?

The answer: Reliable rumors.

I think Chan may/will be a disaster.

by **BRStang** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 pm

SMU Football Blog wrote:
mustang91 wrote:Reliable source says Chan Gailey was offered SMU job this morining and is thinking? Would not post it if it didn't have credence. Source outside of SMU athletics, but in the football industry.

Why do you think I started this thread? Have I ever started such a thread before? No. Why do you think Ted Gangi started a nearly identical thread at Mustangmaniacs at the same time?

The answer: Reliable rumors.

I think Chan may/will be a disaster.

Blog, are you saying that Gailey has been hired? If so, I don't know what to say.

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWDDDDDDD!!!!

by **SWC2010** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:29 pm

SMU Football Blog wrote:
mustang91 wrote:Reliable source says Chan Gailey was offered SMU job this morining and is thinking? Would not post it if it didn't have credence. Source outside of SMU athletics, but in the football industry.

Why do you think I started this thread? Have I ever started such a thread before? No. Why do you think Ted Gangi started a nearly identical thread at Mustangmaniacs at the same time?

The answer: Reliable rumors.

I think Chan may/will be a disaster.

---
No, we've already done disaster, thank you.

Although Chan is not one of my preferreds, he is light years ahead of what we just endured.

by **QuikSStang** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:29 pm

SWC2010 wrote:Although Chan is not one of my preferreds, he is light years ahead of what we just endured.

AMEN TO THAT

by **SMU Football Blog** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:31 pm

At least, in the beginning, Bennett kind of got me excited and made me buy a ticket. Chan, not so much. Most boring personality available

by **BRStang** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:33 pm

SMU Football Blog wrote:At least, in the beginning, Bennett kind of got me excited and made me buy a ticket. Chan, not so much.

Seriously, where did you hear this from?

OHHHHHHHHHHHH GAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWDDDDDD!!!!
OHHHHHHHHHHHH GAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWDDDDDD!!!!
OHHHHHHHHHHHH GAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWDDDDDD!!!!
OHHHHHHHHHHHH GAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWDDDDDD!!!!
OHHHHHHHHHHHH GAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWDDDDDD!!!!

by **SMU Football Blog** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:37 pm

BRStang wrote:
SMU Football Blog wrote:At least, in the beginning, Bennett kind of got me excited and made me buy a ticket. Chan, not so much.

Seriously, where did you hear this from?

If it comes to pass, I will give proper credit. Till then, can't say.

Chan Gailey offered?

Re: Chan Gailey offered?

Re: Chan Gailey offered?

Re: Chan Gailey offered?

Re: Chan Gailey offered?

Who is online