PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby rich59 » Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:07 am

When the Pony Express was at it's height, SMU was in a "3-4" I put it in quotes because it is really an offshoot of the 5-4 Oklahoma, SMU played a lot of option teams and was really successful in shutting them down. Having said that, I believe that personnel is more important than scheme in stopping an offense. If we win the battle at the line of scrimmage, we will win the game.
rich59
Varsity
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:12 am

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby GeorgiaMustang » Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:27 am

whatever we run, we better adjust better than last year. It seemed like we would stack the middle and get them into 3rd and long and then, inexplicably, pull back as though we were expecting them to actually attempt a pass. I really wish I could be in Dallas for this one. It looks like the only home game I will be able to make it to will be the UTEP game. At least I did get to go to Birmingham and watch us beat UAB.
Those who complain about a problem are simply wasting time they could use to fix it.

Potential is nothing, performance is everything.
GeorgiaMustang
All-American
 
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:10 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby rich59 » Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:31 am

It looks to me like this game is crucial from the standpoint that we might have an edge in personnel where we don't in the next two. Losing three straight will make it difficult to regain any momentum and confidence.
rich59
Varsity
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:12 am

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby Mustangsabu » Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:32 am

Coming from someone who never played football and only have the most rudimentary understanding of its niceties, I think we should just put Margus on the line and tell him to consider it the Estonian border.
Mustangs Abu!
User avatar
Mustangsabu
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4438
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby expony18 » Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:41 am

Mustangsabu wrote:Coming from someone who never played football and only have the most rudimentary understanding of its niceties, I think we should just put Margus on the line and tell him to consider it the Estonian border.

the problem with that is you have to be EXTREMElY disciplined against the option. tough to throw someone in there who doesnt have a full grasp of the game
WEST DIVISION CHAMPS 2010
expony18
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9968
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:54 pm

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby smupony » Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:28 am

expony18 wrote:
Mustangsabu wrote:Coming from someone who never played football and only have the most rudimentary understanding of its niceties, I think we should just put Margus on the line and tell him to consider it the Estonian border.

the problem with that is you have to be EXTREMElY disciplined against the option. tough to throw someone in there who doesnt have a full grasp of the game


Agreed. I don't see Margus getting as many plays on defense this week like he did against ECU.
User avatar
smupony
All-American
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 4:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby PK » Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:02 pm

Mustangsabu wrote:Coming from someone who never played football and only have the most rudimentary understanding of its niceties, I think we should just put Margus on the line and tell him to consider it the Estonian border.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
SMU's first president, Robert S. Hyer, selected Harvard Crimson and Yale Blue as SMU's colors to symbolize SMU's high academic standards. We are one of the few Universities to have school colors with real meaning...and we just blow them off.
User avatar
PK
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 8805
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas 75206

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby EastStang » Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:57 pm

Just have Margus stuff the center back into the QB.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12673
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby Stallion » Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:33 pm

Under Ron Meyer SMU ran a 5-2 at least in the Holiday Bowl and the following year when we won SWC Championship (ineligible for Cotton Bowl)

DE Byron Hunt 6-5, 250
DT Harvey Armstrong 6-2, 285
NG Michael Carter 6-2, 290
DT Richard Neely 6-5, 260
DE Eric Ferguson 6-3, 245
LB Gary Moten 6-1, 215
Several including JUCOs

this changed a little depending on year but we definitely were in a 5-2. We never employed a 5-4 although I'm sure we had packages to use against running teams but we always employed 4 DBs. Now under Bobby Collins we went after smaller DEs like Anthony Beverley, Russ Washington, Cornelius Dozier etc who were more hybrid LB type DEs. Could have been some 4-3 alignments with Collins but I still think it was a basic 5-2 but the DEs had more speed and less height.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby Canadian Mustang » Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:21 pm

Alaric wrote:
June Jones said they spent the defensive practices during the bye week working on defending Navy


I like the sounds of this. If we can clamp down on the run early we might have a shot...
User avatar
Canadian Mustang
All-American
 
Posts: 603
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby White Helmet » Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:09 pm

I would like to see Banjo spy the QB and pop him
every play regardless of which option he chose.
User avatar
White Helmet
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2411
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: Oro Valley, AZ

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby rich59 » Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:51 am

To me, the 3-4 is just an NFL name for the college defense called the 5-2 which was derived from the 5-4 Oklahoma defense. The difference being that the defensive ends, which the pros call LBs are in the stand up position. The people who the pros call defensive ends are really tackles in my mind. In the SMU scheme, in other words, Frazier and Taylor are tackles, in my mind. In the 5-4 Oklahoma, most of the time played in the one platoon era, the defensive ends had their hands on the ground and were the offensive ends, the tackles on defense were the offensive tackles, the middle guard was an offensive guard, the two inside lbs were the center and one guard on offense, the outside lbs or corners were the fullback and one halfback on offense and the two safetys were the QB and one halfback on offense. The straight Oklahoma defense had the two inside lbs lined up over the nose of the offensive tackles but on an obvious passing down the lbs went out over the nose of the offensive ends to chuck them as the came off the line. This was called the Western Oklahoma. As people began to use split ends and slot receivers and did more passing, the defensive ends in the 5-2 began to go to the standup position and to be dropped off in pass defense. The Denver Broncos have gone to the 3-4 but one of their outside lbs, who last year was a defensive end and is only 5'11" and 250 pounds is limited in pass coverage and mostly used against the running game and in the pass rush. All this is splitting hairs and mainly a case of semantics.
rich59
Varsity
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:12 am

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby Dooby » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:25 pm

Dooby wrote:I say we run a 4-4-5 until the refs notice


From today's DMN College blog:

http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com ... ctice.html
"We're going to play 13 guys on defense and that should do it right there," Jones said.



June listens to Dooby. So should you.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
User avatar
Dooby
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3005
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby Ponyx2 » Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:31 pm

Dooby wrote:
Dooby wrote:I say we run a 4-4-5 until the refs notice


From today's DMN College blog:

http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com ... ctice.html
"We're going to play 13 guys on defense and that should do it right there," Jones said.



June listens to Dooby. So should you.



“It’s tough to score on our 6-6 defense”

- Kansas Coach Pepper Rodgers, after Penn State scored a 2 point conversion on their second try to win the 1969 Orange Bowl 15-14. The first attempt failed but Kansas was penalized for too many men on the field.
Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein.
- Joe Theismann
User avatar
Ponyx2
All-American
 
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:00 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Wonk-ish football question re: triple option

Postby San Antonio Mustang » Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:40 pm

I read somewhere that we are going to use a 4-3 defense. If that is correct who will be starters in each position?
San Antonio Mustang
All-American
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:46 am
Location: San Antonio

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

 
cron