|
|
Should we allow them to be called......??????Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Should we allow them to be called......??????
Back in the day of freshman football, they were - well, the Wogs. SMU had the Colts, UT had the Shorthorns, Rice Owlettes, Baylor Cubs - can't remember what the A&M or Arkansas freshmen were called.
Re: Should we allow them to be called......??????
How about dikfer?
Re: Should we allow them to be called......??????
oh, i'll bite. what's a dic.....wait. nevermind.  Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
Re: Should we allow them to be called......??????
Arkansas was the Shoats. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: Should we allow them to be called......??????
one word for you ponies:
scoreboard. If the tables are turned by late Friday night, after the Frog half (two thirds?) of Ford Stadium empties out, then we'll take about names. (for a team that hasn't come close to beating the Frogs since your oldest players were still in high school, y'all talk a lot of smack. I guess that old TCU-SMU rivalry ain't so dead as it used to be...) ________________________________________________________________
for TCU football, visit http://www.frogsowar.com
Re: Should we allow them to be called......??????
The aggie freshmen were called the Concubines. Pretty sure.
Re: Should we allow them to be called......??????
wasn't TCU the "wogs" back in the days of SWC football and FR teams? Colts vs Wogs. Let's do it!
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests |
|
