Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

by **CalallenStang** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:43 am

Peruna 2K5 wrote:Do we really need to know the underwear they'll be sporting??

How else would Nike advertise their products at no cost whatsoever?

by **Mitch McConnell** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:36 am

Biggun wrote:Too bad TCU can't wear a traditional uniform in college football's most tradition rich bowl. ALL of those Nike pro combat unis are brutal.

Indeed. A disgraceful look for this game. However the purple is involved won't save this look. They sold out for marketing. They should be embarrassed.

A top 5-10 program needs to dress like one. That's not what's going on here.

by **Treadway21** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:26 am

From uniwatch on TCU wearing purple instead of the ones pictured:

Uni Watch says: Doesn't really matter either way, since the Horned Frogs are pretty much the ugliest team in the nation no matter what they wear.

by **Corp** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:29 pm

Well, apparently they weren't a complete washout in 2010....

Undefeated season: 12-0, Nationally ranked @ #3, Rose Bowl bid, Second BCS bowl

appearance, Big East invite, AQ status, Average attendance: 42,466 (4 sellouts),

New state-of-the-art football stadium, Football recruiting ranking @ #25 :roll:

by **RGV Pony** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:34 pm

Corp wrote:Well, apparently they weren't a complete washout in 2010....

Undefeated season: 12-0, Nationally ranked @ #3, Rose Bowl bid, Second BCS bowl

appearance, Big East invite, AQ status, Average attendance: 42,466 (4 sellouts),

New state-of-the-art football stadium, Football recruiting ranking @ #25

and yet all the local pub goes to lil' ol SMU and our sordid tale of the early 80s

by **Mitch McConnell** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:43 pm

Corp wrote:Well, apparently they weren't a complete washout in 2010....

Undefeated season: 12-0, Nationally ranked @ #3, Rose Bowl bid, Second BCS bowl

appearance, Big East invite, AQ status, Average attendance: 42,466 (4 sellouts),

New state-of-the-art football stadium, Football recruiting ranking @ #25

Yeah, we understand that because 10 years of commitment will produce those kinds of results. But everything isn't perfect either like your crappy new uniforms. I'm sure the recruits love that business and are all into it. And if you can successfully can sell that to them, terrific.

When does your coaching staff start wearing Members Only Jackets?

Also, why are 2011 games being moved to Farrington Field? I thought your stadium would at least be ready to play games.

by **Pony ^** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:45 pm

possibly the worst uniforms in history

by **EastStang** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:22 pm

I'm sorry those are hideous, but still not as bad as those Oregon monstrosities.

by **b_caesar** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:03 pm

This holds no interest to me. I'd rather focus on the bowl game that SMU will be playing on Dec 30. K? Thx.

by **froglicious** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:42 pm

This uni is all about the shoe technology. We aren't obligated to wear anything other than the shoes. According to our AD, we will be in purple as the home team. We will look kicka$$ and will kicka$$ despite NickSam and other BCS Conf lovers.

See you guys in the BE in a few years hopefully. Keep filling the Ford and it will happen.

by **Oldmins** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:23 pm

Mitch McConnell wrote:
Corp wrote:Well, apparently they weren't a complete washout in 2010....

Undefeated season: 12-0, Nationally ranked @ #3, Rose Bowl bid, Second BCS bowl

appearance, Big East invite, AQ status, Average attendance: 42,466 (4 sellouts),

New state-of-the-art football stadium, Football recruiting ranking @ #25

Yeah, we understand that because 10 years of commitment will produce those kinds of results. But everything isn't perfect either like your crappy new uniforms. I'm sure the recruits love that business and are all into it. And if you can successfully can sell that to them, terrific.

When does your coaching staff start wearing Members Only Jackets?

Also, why are 2011 games being moved to Farrington Field? I thought your stadium would at least be ready to play games.

Hey Mitch, generally enjoy your comments. Agree that the new Nike uniforms are (if there were a better word I'd use it) awful. No connection with school. And most Frog fans (over on their forum) agree with you 100%. One correction. No 2011 games scheduled for Farrington Field. The north end zone seats and all the east stadium, plus the ground to field level seats on the west side will all be usable and used. Games to be at ACS as usual, just lower capacity.

by **Mitch McConnell** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:25 pm

The Farrington Field comment was just a little jab. JK

by **Nacho** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:41 pm

fatterson will be wearing:

http://www.amazon.com/Mafia-Gangster-Me ... B0044MPOC4

by **Corp** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:38 pm

"Envy is the most insidious of the seven deadly sins" - Epstein :wink:

by **Mitch McConnell** » Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:02 pm

Hey, look everybody. It's Corp with another edition of his unfunny zingers.

How do you reach such a level?

Don't answer that. We don't care.

Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Re: Oh, dear....Frog look for RB

Who is online