Charleston Pony wrote:all I know is that this team is going to have to win 5 (if not all 6) home games this year to go 7-5 and get another bowl game
We will most likely get a bowl game at 6-6...issue is going to be getting that 6th win
|
Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
36 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR's
We will most likely get a bowl game at 6-6...issue is going to be getting that 6th win
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sLighting doesn't explain approx. 100 yards in penalties. . .including one of the most obvious pass interference calls I've ever seen (1st quarter pick that was called back). Lighting doesn't explain 3 turnovers, including two fumbles by senior receivers while running after the catch. Lighting doesn't explain the offense doing absolutely nothing in the second half against a physically overmatched defense. I'm not saying the lighting isn't an issue, but there was a heck of a lot more going on last night with this team than lighting. I hope they can straighten it out and start showing some consistency on both sides of the ball going forward.
Last edited by 1983 Cotton Bowl on Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sHollman had the big fumble in the first half while we were driving...he is a soph. regardless of his class, there is no excuse.
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sExcuse me, you're right. For some reason I had it in my head that the first fumble was Wilkerson.
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sDon't throw bombs from the 5 yd line.
Next... Seriously, the lights reflect perfectly into cameras and fans eyes. This has been a real issue. Boise changed their field to low reflective field specifically for this treason. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5110598 We have the same problem with our new turf Maybe higher placement?
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sWatch what happens to UCF in those lights at night. They are going to spank JJ and company.
Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sSound system still sucks
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR's
What was sad about this fumble (which was right in front of me) was that he purposed shifted the ball to his inside arm, against all taught procedure, and then was hit right on the ball, and out it came. Fundamentals please. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sHow was the lighting in Orlando?
![]()
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR's
it sounded bad, much better than two years ago but they crank it to the point of distortion. ![]() Go Ponies!!
Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR's
It may be bad, but it doesn't rise to the level of treason... Derail the Frogs!
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR'sI was like what did I say that was treasonous? I mentioned Boise...
Then I read it. Treason. Ha!
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR's
Just giving you a hard time, GRGB. Derail the Frogs!
Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR's
Your true colors are starting to show. ![]() Better not say that to OTP because he probably will say that SMU will spank UCF. "We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown
________________________Champion________________________ ![]()
Re: Re: Lighting could have been a problem for the WR's
Pulling for SMU just stating a fact. You don't spend your cash flying around to every away game then pull for another team. My team is SMU Last edited by Mestengo on Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
36 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests |
|