Rice

by **feelthehorsepower** » Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:58 pm

Mustangsabu wrote:We competed very well in the AAC. Other than 1 game we lost by 3 (triple overtime), 3 and 4 points.

Saying we aren't competitive in the AAC is silly. And in CUSA we would be even more so.

Agreed, we can compete in the AAC.

Triple option and Clemson offense will surely help us become dominant.

by **Big Hoss** » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:06 pm

feelthehorsepower wrote:
Mustangsabu wrote:We competed very well in the AAC. Other than 1 game we lost by 3 (triple overtime), 3 and 4 points.

Saying we aren't competitive in the AAC is silly. And in CUSA we would be even more so.

Agreed, we can compete in the AAC.

Triple option and Clemson offense will surely help us become dominant.

We always seemed to say the same thing about CUSA, and yet we always found ways to lose. Tell me again how many CUSA championships we have? Ok, how about the WAC? Mmmm hmmmm. Well, Rice has a CUSA championship, and won it in pretty convincing fashion, and we can't say that.

There is no point in arguing about who would beat whom if we played them. It doesn't matter. AAC is really not any better than CUSA this year, and we still only managed to win 4 games in conference.