|
smu tops tcu but...Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
19 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: smu tops tcu but...Yeah I thought about including Boise but their isolated location and terrible academics make them a non-comparison for a school like SMU. The fact that they have achieved such remarkable success while we've wallowed in mediocrity is disgusting.
Back off Warchild seriously.
Re: smu tops tcu but...
And yet we have a 1-5 record against them with all that NFL talent. They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
Re: smu tops tcu but...Why do people list academics as an advantage for SMU? It is a disadvantage. Not that we shouldn't be able to get over it, but the athletes NEVER come for an actual education, so the more academic you are the harder it is to get them to come and to stay. Others have figured out how to hand out fake degrees, so they have overcome the problem - but academics has no place in the decision matrix for the typical athlete that we should want to recruit.
Re: smu tops tcu but...
There are quality athletes for whom academics matter. I would be happy if we did as well as Stanford (11-3, Rose Bowl), Vandy (9-4, BBVA Compass Bowl) or Duke (10-4, Chik-fil-a Bowl).
19 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests |
|