SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented UNT

by **dirtysouthpony** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 11:50 am

Burcham is not the answer.

by **Charleston Pony** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 11:55 am

only problem is that UNT is not "lesser talented" than SMU

by **blackoutpony** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 11:58 am

SMU 86 wrote:
blackoutpony wrote:
SMU 86 wrote:We have more talent so they could put up some big numbers today.

Glad the thought of beating up on crap teams makes you happy.

Just calling them like I see them.

What color glasses are you wearing?

by **skurtn** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:15 pm

Man I was hoping this was the case. Our O is going to kill our D. Feels like 2 years ago in GG's first year.. except the D was better then.

by **dr rc** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:18 pm

blackoutpony wrote:
What color glasses are you wearing?

by **red85** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:30 pm

This SMU team just sucks, plain and simple. Best thing for the future would be JJ getting a heat stroke and never returning to the sideline.

by **sbsmith** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:42 pm

SMU 86 wrote:We have more talent so they could put up some big numbers today.

Care to reconsider :lol:

by **Tiki Owl** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 1:04 pm

Thank goodness you guys (along with Tulsa and UH) are gone. Drag down the AAC. So far the AAC

SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented UNT

Re: SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented

Re: SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented

Re: SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented

Re: SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented

Re: SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented

Re: SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented

Re: SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented

Re: SMU's offense will get clicking against lesser talented

Who is online