|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by mrydel » Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:07 pm
skyscraper wrote:In the presser, it sounds like Van is gone after the bowl. Said they're searching for best DC possible.
Of course most assistants are on 1 year deals so Van could be one being interviewed.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by sail420s » Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:31 pm
mrydel wrote:Of course most assistants are on 1 year deals so Van could be one being interviewed.
Out of respect for the prior staff (if they earned it or not) I would expect that any leftovers get interviewed. Even if you know you have no intent of hiring them or already have someone else lined up.
-
sail420s

-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:14 pm
- Location: The Colony, TX
by footballdad » Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:38 pm
PoconoPony wrote:No DC will be able to immediately over come our lack of size, speed, strength and talent on the D side. Unfortunately, this will all take time, luck and some great recruiting. Our only hope for next season is that the O remains potent and can win some games despite the D being over matched.
More proof positive that Morris recruiting was being overrated by you know who. 3 years with little to no improvement, and a largely bare cupboard, on the defensive side of the ball. Morris was slick, gotta give him credit.
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by dr rc » Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:16 pm
footballdad wrote:PoconoPony wrote:No DC will be able to immediately over come our lack of size, speed, strength and talent on the D side. Unfortunately, this will all take time, luck and some great recruiting. Our only hope for next season is that the O remains potent and can win some games despite the D being over matched.
More proof positive that Morris recruiting was being overrated by you know who. 3 years with little to no improvement, and a largely bare cupboard, on the defensive side of the ball. Morris was slick, gotta give him credit.
Ehh... I think that's more of an indictment of Texas HS football than it is of CM's defensive recruitment. Defense in Texas HS football straight sucks. Almost all the best players are moved to offense. We can produce the occasional skill players but for the most part there isn't a single school that uses Texas as it's main recruiting base with a consistently good defense. TCU tends to be the best in most years and even they really aren't all that great.
-
dr rc

-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:06 pm
by Charleston Pony » Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:57 pm
Most of the best athletes want to play on the offensive side of the ball. Have to convince guys that they have their best chance to excel on defense. Patterson has done a good job of converting guys from O to D
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
by Stallion » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:10 pm
5 of 10 Worst Defenses in College Football Were in the AAC:
120. Memphis 476.3 121. SMU 486.7 126. UCONN 519.0 127. Tulsa 528.9 129. ECU 541.7
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by feelan » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:14 pm
footballdad wrote:PoconoPony wrote:No DC will be able to immediately over come our lack of size, speed, strength and talent on the D side. Unfortunately, this will all take time, luck and some great recruiting. Our only hope for next season is that the O remains potent and can win some games despite the D being over matched.
More proof positive that Morris recruiting was being overrated by you know who. 3 years with little to no improvement, and a largely bare cupboard, on the defensive side of the ball. Morris was slick, gotta give him credit.
Seemed to me that Morris recruited more heavily on the offensive side, which makes sense for an offensive guy so not sure it is an indictment of his recruiting as a whole. I just wish he had brought in a few more on the defensive side.
-
feelan

-
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by redpony » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:15 pm
actually I had us at #122 passing yds allowed - #121 rushing yds allowed - #122 ko return D - #104
those numbers were taken from the NCAA official stat site.
-
redpony

-
- Posts: 10968
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
- Location: on the beach,northern Peru
by Stallion » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:18 pm
this is the official NCAA website-we're at 121 Total Defense. Louisiana got beat by Auburn last weekend-maybe they moved behind us http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/ ... team/22/p3
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by ponywhupp9202 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:45 pm
I just read that Phil Bennett is leaving ASU after their bowl game,.......for what it's worth.
-

ponywhupp9202

-
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:40 am
- Location: Flower Mound, TX
by SMUer » Tue Dec 12, 2017 9:08 pm
feelan wrote:footballdad wrote:PoconoPony wrote:No DC will be able to immediately over come our lack of size, speed, strength and talent on the D side. Unfortunately, this will all take time, luck and some great recruiting. Our only hope for next season is that the O remains potent and can win some games despite the D being over matched.
More proof positive that Morris recruiting was being overrated by you know who. 3 years with little to no improvement, and a largely bare cupboard, on the defensive side of the ball. Morris was slick, gotta give him credit.
Seemed to me that Morris recruited more heavily on the offensive side, which makes sense for an offensive guy so not sure it is an indictment of his recruiting as a whole. I just wish he had brought in a few more on the defensive side.
Then he was stupid or foolish at best
-

SMUer

-
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America
by JasonB » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:57 pm
feelan wrote:footballdad wrote:PoconoPony wrote:No DC will be able to immediately over come our lack of size, speed, strength and talent on the D side. Unfortunately, this will all take time, luck and some great recruiting. Our only hope for next season is that the O remains potent and can win some games despite the D being over matched.
More proof positive that Morris recruiting was being overrated by you know who. 3 years with little to no improvement, and a largely bare cupboard, on the defensive side of the ball. Morris was slick, gotta give him credit.
Seemed to me that Morris recruited more heavily on the offensive side, which makes sense for an offensive guy so not sure it is an indictment of his recruiting as a whole. I just wish he had brought in a few more on the defensive side.
I think we have some decent talent at DL, S, and CB. None of our LBs have panned out, Badejo is a tweener, Michael Scott left, and the scheme really sucked. It was completely dependent on the Star player, which we were never able to recruit successfully. Not finding a way to get McQueen a ton of PT last year was criminal as well.
-
JasonB

-
- Posts: 7226
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Allen, Tx, USA
by leopold » Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:17 pm
Is the lack of ability at LB potentially solved by a simple change of scheme?
Dykes has said himself that he is willing to adjust his schemes to fit his personnel and he just came from TCU. If we hire a 4-2-5 guy and our transfer from A&M pans out then it seems to me that all he has to do is find one more playmaker. Is that a possible solution?
-

leopold

-
- Posts: 4112
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Columbia, SC
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
|
|