PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

As per request, Texasscout96's views on the 08 Mustang class

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Postby Texasscout96 » Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:52 pm

stampedesbabyboy wrote:Scout; are you watching Game Tape or HL Tape?
Stallion; point well taken!


Just to let you know, I have been watching both game film and some highlights as well. The highlight films are obviously easier to get, but being in Dallas and having a history in these parts, I am able to get my hands on game film too.
SMU Grad 1996 - Worked in SMU athletic recruiting office under Forrest Gregg and Bill Weidner from 1992-1997.
Texasscout96
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:39 pm

Postby Pony81 » Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:09 pm

I think Stallion's points about SMU football are largely on the mark. If I can summarize:

1. SMU can not be competitive in D1 football unless it can take partial qualifiers and JUCO's.
True. We are not a name program and will never get the talented kids because of our name. Look at the 2nd tier programs that have had success: UCF, USF, TCU ect. and they all are built on JUCO's and partial qualifier big time talent.
2. Talent transcends coaching.
True. Look at how much attention recruiting gets. YOu can coach kids until you are blue in the face but if they are smaller, slower, and less athletic - you lose.
3. Coaching allows you to turn a good team into a very good team and vice versa. Look at SMU last year under Bennett. Another staff and this team is 500 but with Bennett they found a way to lose. They did not believe in themselves nor their coaches. Coaching does not turn a poor team into a great one.

So I think he makes a good point that our class is average relative to CUSA given about the fact that SMU was the only D1 offer for 1/2 our class reflects that these guys were not highly recruited and were 2nd choice / fall back recruits for most teams.

The good news is that we are in a weak conference, have an administration that realizes that winning athletics put a positive halo over a school (how they forgot that is beyond me) with positive ramifications in student recruiting, student retention, and alumni giving, have a coach that can make us a very good CUSA team by coaching up the talent currently on the team. Just getting these kids to believe they can win and to believe in their coaches is 2-3 wins in CUSA.
Pony 81
Pony81
Heisman
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:09 pm

Previous

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BIGHORSE, Google [Bot] and 2 guests

 
cron