PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

What the BCS Matchups Should Have Been

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Postby QuikSStang » Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:22 am

i think the teams in the BCS were fine, other than Illinois over Mizzou. I just didn't like some of the matchups. I would rather see Hawaii play West Virginia and Georgia vs. USC. Having two blowout games just doesn't make sense. I wish all the selection committees would get together or something, rather than Bowl 1 pick two teams, then Bowl 2, etc
Image
User avatar
QuikSStang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1519
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Dalla$

Postby J.T.supporta » Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:33 am

QuikSStang wrote:i think the teams in the BCS were fine, other than Illinois over Mizzou. I just didn't like some of the matchups. I would rather see Hawaii play West Virginia and Georgia vs. USC. Having two blowout games just doesn't make sense. I wish all the selection committees would get together or something, rather than Bowl 1 pick two teams, then Bowl 2, etc


when u think about it, it wasnt Illinois over Mizzou. It was Illinois over Arizona State and KU over MU

if you look back in the history of all BCS games...there have been at least 2 blowouts in 4 years of the BCS existence

and each BCS bowl game gets to pick their teams but not by 2...only 1 team at a time
User avatar
J.T.supporta
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6160
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: SMU

Previous

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BIGHORSE and 8 guests