Bergermeister wrote:jtstang wrote: I think the reason a guy like James is vocal in his criticism is BECAUSE its his alma mater and he loves it.
There is nothing wrong with constructive criticism but he has publicly bashed the program and never publicly offered a solution or presented a plan to right the ship. He proclaimed us virtual cellar-dwellers as opposed to saying "SMU has got to get out of this hole and this is what they need to do to be successful again.... I know they can get it turned around if they make the right moves." So, he has been a part of the problem, not a part of the solution.
Gone to Lubbock.
If given a public forum other than this provincial board, most of us would have vented in a similar manner. How do you know he didn't make those suggestions privately to those that matter only to be met with promises of change that never materialized? Remember the "Committment?"
