|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by East Coast Mustang » Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:27 pm
Bergermeister wrote:1984 Aloha Bowl - Bobby Collins, Head Coach 1985 No Bowl 1986 No Bowl 1987 No Bowl 1988 No Bowl 1989 No Bowl 1990 No Bowl 1991 No Bowl 1992 No Bowl 1993 No Bowl 1994 No Bowl 1995 No Bowl 1996 No Bowl 1997 No Bowl 1998 No Bowl 1999 No Bowl 2000 No Bowl 2001 No Bowl 2002 No Bowl 2003 No Bowl 2004 No Bowl 2005 No Bowl 2006 No Bowl 2007 No Bowl 2008 No Bowl 2009 Hawai'i Bowl - June Jones, Head Coach 2010 Armed Forces Bowl - June Jones, Head Coach 2011 BBVA Compass Bowl - June Jones, Head Coach 2012 Hawai'i Bowl - June Jones, Head Coach
This.
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
-

East Coast Mustang

-
- Posts: 7432
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am
by SMU2007 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:42 pm
mustangxc wrote:SMU2007 wrote:yay mediocrity. Here are the wins to get us to those 4 games:
2009: SFA UAB ECU Tulsa Rice UTEP Tulane
2010: UAB Wash St. Rice Tulsa Tulane Marshall ECU
2011: UTEP NW St. Memphis TCU* (this was a great win) Tulane Rice
2012: SFA UTEP Houston Memphis S. Miss Tulsa
I guess these wins get some people excited.
Previously we were losing to those same teams. BTW you are making a very strong case for why it is difficult to recruit to SMU in football. Even when we beat the teams on our schedule, our fans don't care. We rarely fill our 32,000 seat stadium. With fans like ours I would never give SMU a look in football. What do we offer in football that would make us attractive to the top athletes? If you want a solid education go to Stanford, USC, UCLA, Rice, Duke, Michigan, Virginia, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, etc. If you want a rabid fan base pick an SEC or BIG school. I think there is a niche for us, but our fans are fairly delusional. SMU is not the most welcoming school for minorities and many top football players are minorities.
I agree with every single one of your points. Particularly, smu being a difficult place to recruit to. That's why it takes even more effort than it might at another place and another reason why this staff is not what we need right now. The coaches who were most active on the recruiting trail were run off in some sort of p*ssing match. The ones we have now at least appear to be in complete "wait for them to come to us" mode. I'm not asking for us to reel in 5 star recruits, but like I mentioned before, tcu has had almost no 4 or 5 star recruits until pretty recently. I am also fairly confident that they had very few recruits with zero other offers whereas we always seem to have a lot of those. Why are we not regularly competing with (whoever you want to consider our peer) for recruits instead of NW Louisiana State and Univ of Phoenix? If this staff is out there aggressively recruiting, they sure are being quiet about it. The only way anyone will ever care about any of the wins in this current conference is if we are fighting for a bcs slot. The only way that is happening is with better recruiting top to bottom. And the only way that is happening is with a different staff.
-

SMU2007

-
- Posts: 5561
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am
by Mustangs_Maroons » Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:43 pm
[quote="mustangxcPreviously we were losing to those same teams. BTW you are making a very strong case for why it is difficult to recruit to SMU in football. Even when we beat the teams on our schedule, our fans don't care. We rarely fill our 32,000 seat stadium. With fans like ours I would never give SMU a look in football. What do we offer in football that would make us attractive to the top athletes? If you want a solid education go to Stanford, USC, UCLA, Rice, Duke, Michigan, Virginia, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, etc. If you want a rabid fan base pick an SEC or BIG school. I think there is a niche for us, but our fans are fairly delusional. SMU is not the most welcoming school for minorities and many top football players are minorities.[/quote]
Your argument is clearly thrown out the window when you could say the same thing about basketball, but look what a great coach with motivated recruiters can do. SMU can be attractive, and I would argue, to a certain extent, moreso in football, where we have a tradition of great football players (Doak Walker, Eric Dickerson, etc.) Can you say the same about some of the schools we're doormats to now? Quit with the excuses. Yes, Jones did help to bring us from being a cellar dweller to a team that borders on mediocrity. For all the money spent on football, we shouldn't settle for mediocrity anymore, and Jones is clearly not willing to do the work to get us to the next level. I'm sure we have qualified peopel that can find us a good replacement. It's in a better state now, but I don't think any of us can be content with where we are at, unless we're happy with mediocrity.
-

Mustangs_Maroons

-
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 am
- Location: New York, NY
by mustangxc » Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:54 pm
I think our fans will care when we beat Memphis, Cincinnati, UCONN, Temple, etc. in basketball, not so much in football. So not apples to apples. Attendance is proportionately not nearly as bad in basketball as in football and can get decent much more easily. As has been stated repeatedly, even in our best years we never had more than 32,000 fans for any opponent that did not bring huge numbers of fans with them.
-

mustangxc

-
- Posts: 7338
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm
by couch 'em » Sat Sep 07, 2013 8:06 pm
Bennett 2007
"I think Couchem is right." -EVERYONE
-

couch 'em

-
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests
|
|