ponyboy wrote:See, you can say that without hate and pitchforks.
But then where's all the fun of an unruly lynch mob?
|
Stats 2000-2013Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
54 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: Stats 2000-2013
But then where's all the fun of an unruly lynch mob?
Re: Stats 2000-2013
You are correct - Mizzou at Cotton Bowl. Missed extra point and missed FGs. We could have won at Mizzou as well. Also missed FGs that would have beaten UCLA at the Rose Bowl as well as vs. A&M at Alamodome. And the La Tech blowout was to start Caven's last year - not Phil's first - to give credit where it is due. "Moral Victories Make Me Sick" - TR
![]()
Re: Stats 2000-2013
![]()
Re: Stats 2000-2013
I will do this for you when I get a second, but it doesn't change the end result very much as you saw with Fresno. Pitt was 69.65 and Nevada was 69.43. In response to the question about Texas teams, yes durung JJ the P5 teams are stronger, as is the botton half of CUSA. This is why I chose to look at 3 best wins and 3 worst losses (by rating). A really good team who beats a 90 sagarin team but has to play a bunch of 40 sagarin teams may have a final sagarin rating lower that a team that beat nothing but solid 70s teams. But isn't the team who beat tge stronger team probably better? "I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
Re: Stats 2000-2013Ex. TCU had a Strength of Schedule of 21 and SMU about 70. SMU had a better record but got trounced on the field by TCU
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: Stats 2000-2013
Lemur. Couchem your avatar is flat out hilarious. "We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown
________________________Champion________________________ ![]()
Re: Stats 2000-2013
meh
Re: Stats 2000-2013
meha haha. ![]() #HammerDown
54 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests |
|