|
We will beat TechModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower Re: We will beat TechShort the sleep the Raider is taking,
'ere the morrow's morn is breaking Techsans shall have a rude awakening roused by SMU men!
Re: We will beat Tech
Is a turd muffin something new that they're now selling at Whole Foods. Must be some kind on super duper bran filled cupcake. ![]() Smustatesman aka NUKE......I procreate and I vote.
Re: We will beat TechI watched Tech scrimmage when they came to Midland during their spring football practices. I think Michael Brewer could be a stud at QB. If he has the same make up as his dad and grandad he will be very good. Their receivers are very fast.
GO MUSTANGS!
Re: We will beat Tech
Red Horse is some nasty brew. Laced with gin, no?
Re: We will beat TechMany say our offense will change greatly thanks to Mumme. Is that not in effect a new coach/offense for our offense?
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
Re: We will beat Tech
Tech's admission standards are significantly higher than UH. Just this year UH raised its admission standards to pass UNT. Tech's admission standards are 4th in the Big 12 but that has little affect on USN&WR rankings.
Re: We will beat Tech
You would give your left nut for SMU to have a fan base as passionate as Tech's.
Re: We will beat TechThe classless crowd at tech are mostly the locals, not the students. Tech is the only game in town for a bunch of West Texas rough around the edges types. This bleeds over some to the student culture but they aren't the base.
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
Re: We will beat Tech
I think couch 'em is right
Re: We will beat Tech
Based on the 5-6 games I have attended up in Lubbock, this is true. The students are going to be students, does not matter what school you are talking about. The "T-shirt"fans are the idiots, usually. GO MUSTANGS!
Re: We will beat TechAlthough i do wish we had a bigger fan base, if passion leads to the things i have seen idiot tech fans due i am fine right where we are. Rather be small then big and total idiots
Was going to refute that Tech's admission standards were 4th in the big 12, and then realized how bad the conference is in that area. I guess you have UT at the top, then maybe Baylor, then Kansas and then TCU. That would put Tech 5th. I would guess maybe OU is also ahead of Tech, but is that really it? Kansas st - definately not. WVA - nope OSU - no way. What an academic wasteland. Pretty good football though.
Re: We will beat TechMustangsabu, it's one thing to say that you're going to win. (Which I think SMU has about a 45-55 chance of doing) but it's an entirely different thing to say you're going to win 52-28. This year will determine whether or not JJ's "hidden gem" recruiting strategy works.
You can say stars and recruiting services don't matter and there are cases where they have been wrong, but for the most part, it is highly accurate. This year will make or break JJ's tenure in Dallas and the program as a whole.
Re: We will beat TechYou can say stars and recruiting services don't matter and there are cases where they have been wrong, but for the most part, it is highly accurate. This year will make or break JJ's tenure in Dallas and the program as a whole.[/quote]
Hyperbole much? This season will not "define the program". It may very well go down in flames, but IMO, that would be far better for the longterm health of the program. If SMU hires a young, aggressive coach that surrounds himself with strong recruiters with Texas ties like it has in basketball, then this thing could go places that JJ could never take it. The infrastructure of the SMU football program is 1000000000x better in 2013 than we got JJ in 2007 when no one thought we could get him. Back off Warchild seriously.
Re: We will beat TechI just worry that the entire game all we will hear is "RAIDER POWER" like the last time Tech came to SMU. I brought friends to that game and they were going on about how bad they felt for the players, along with laughing at me/SMU.
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests |
|