|
SMU ranked #10 in AAC by CFNModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower Re: SMU ranked #10 in AAC by CFNCruise control
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: SMU ranked #10 in AAC by CFNQB is kinda important. Can't just roll someone out at QB because they try hard. Hicks had 41 rushes for -83 yards last year. Sure it was a messed up situation with them keeping the reigns on him due to him being the only serviceable option most of the year. Maybe the quantum leap in QB competition and depth will rip the chains off and Hicks will become Pat Mahomes.
When you have Sutton and Quinn and no defense, it would behoove the fine gentlemen of SMU to have more than a bus driver.
Re: SMU ranked #10 in AAC by CFNIf you want to get the ball to Sutton, Proche and Quinn then Hicks and Peavey would probably get the ball because the last video on Gillens shows he's pretty raw. Hicks cut down on the sacks by about 15 in one year. He'll never be a strong running QB but as mrydel says you can still use him when he's not being respected by the defense. Last year he had no backup so it was understandable. Sacks were manageable at something like 26 sacks with a below average offensive line. Gillens would add another dimension to the offense no question but the jury is out on his effect on the passing game. He probably has the highest ceiling but he's got a long way to go to be the starter in a little over 3 weeks of fall camp.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: SMU ranked #10 in AAC by CFN
No problem Sally. Always glad to help those with limited football knowledge, like yourself. Cheers Little Guy.
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 15 guests |
|