SMU @ Boise Game Thread

by **Mustangs35SMU** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:39 pm

Ball game

SMU: 14
Boise State: 38
2:04 left in the 3rd

by **ponyte** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:43 pm

We need a drive and score. It is important that we improve the O at this point. We have hung tough with a top 25 team and we need to keep it as close as possible.

by **Mustangs35SMU** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:43 pm

Ok All these running plays that arent working...You dont use anymore!! Come on coach now!

Throw it deep or something

by **Mustangs35SMU** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:44 pm

End of the 3rd Quarter
The SMU Mustangs: 14
The Boise State Broncos: 38

by **Charleston Pony** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:47 pm

Need tp see more of Romo in this one. It's over, so last thing we need is to have Eckert get hurt. Need both of those guys if we are going to finish out this season with a couple of wins against Nevada, UTEP or Tulsa. Rice and La Tech will be tough games.

by **ponyte** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:47 pm

OSU blew us out, which is the other top 25 team we played. No doubt we have improved to hang tough with BSU. We have had a poor performance from the specialty teams, which has really hurt us. Now the O has to do something.

by **Charleston Pony** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:51 pm

why do we not see more of Ryan Kennedy in this offense?

by **ponyte** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:54 pm

well, the O did a little but certainly not enough. For once we have a decent speciality team performance. Now the D needs to step up.

by **BRStang** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:56 pm

Pass to Kennedy just intercepted....%*@$&!!!!

by **Mustangs35SMU** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 9:56 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:why do we not see more of Ryan Kennedy in this offense?

Got your wish and intercepted

by **lawless** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 10:03 pm

Yeah, ok, there are NO moral victories, BUT...here we are in conference play, and early on in the fourth, we managed to grab a TO deep in the opponent's territory. We've hammered receivers over the middle, drilled some RBs in the backfield, and we scored on an early TO. We've SCARED a potent offense, in short.

This time last year, it was Tulsa suprising the locals w/ their efforts on the blue field, and it signalled a "program turnaround." Nah, we ain't making no bowl this year, but I'm SO encouraged w/ the spirit of tonight's effort.

by **ponyte** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 10:09 pm

I am listening to the game and not watching it. I really like the sound of our defense. I know the score is a bit high but we have played at a field position disadvantage and done well. Our O has been non-existent. And against a top 25 team I am encouraged.

by **Huey78** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 10:11 pm

ponyte wrote:I am listening to the game and not watching it. I really like the sound of our defense. I know the score is a bit high but we have played at a field position disadvantage and done well. Our O has been non-existent. And against a top 25 team I am encouraged.

Absolutely...

am proud of the fight in our guys tonight... offense even kicked in.

Doesn't feel as lopsided as the score looks at all.

by **Arkpony** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 10:11 pm

More tries up the middle of the line...Roma, Munlin, Dorsey..it doesn't matter!!!!! We cannot move the center of their line. Give it up!!! Geesh!

by **mrydel** » Sat Oct 02, 2004 10:13 pm

We just need more time and experience on the O line. That will come. It is the special team play that bothers me. That needs to improve if we are to beat the 2nd tier conference teams.

SMU @ Boise Game Thread

Re:

Re:

Who is online