PonyFans.com

SMU Fan Site
http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/

TCU Chants...No way

http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10394

Page 1 of 5

TCU Chants...No way

PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 7:06 pm
by Mustangs35SMU
Ok Im sorry but I personally dont want to listen to TCU fans screaming T....C....U all night to the hey song so I say we join in...but say SMU instead...If everyone knows the Hey song aka Rock Roll Part 1 instead of saying Hey they go T so we should go S...anyone up for it or am I just making myself look like an idiot

PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:27 pm
by TCU OWNS SMU
Chanting S-M-U in place of T-C-U........REBEL

PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:16 pm
by Mustangs35SMU
Better than sitting there and listening to that chant all night lmao :lol:

Re:

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:30 am
by BleedingRed+Blue
TCU OWNS SMU wrote:Chanting S-M-U in place of T-C-U........REBEL

Interesting screen name, considering the series is separated by a single game.

Re:

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:54 am
by TCU OWNS SMU
BleedingRed+Blue wrote:
TCU OWNS SMU wrote:Chanting S-M-U in place of T-C-U........REBEL

Interesting screen name, considering the series is separated by a single game.



TCU has beaten SMU 5 years straight, by a combined score of 158-36. We are consistently Top 25 and in the running for BCS Bowl, while SMU hasn't won a game in two years. This is DOMINATION. We have you bent over, more than any other rivalry in college football. After this year, that will be 6 years straight.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:12 am
by Hoofbeat83
a nice reminder that tcu is still not on SMU's academic plane.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:16 am
by regis
Six-in-a-row is nothing. SMU beat the froggies 15 consecutive from '72-'86 and 19-out-of-21 if you go back to '66.

Re:

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:17 am
by TCU OWNS SMU
Hoofbeat83 wrote:a nice reminder that tcu is still not on SMU's academic plane.


TCU being a superior education and a more elite academic school is not news. TCU has been ahead of SMU for the past 3 years in-a-row. TCU is now more selective than UT, and second in the state behind Rice.

The application rate to TCU for 2004-2005 was 8,059. That is an increase of 5.3% over 2003 and 31.3% over 2002.

TCU offered admission to 63.9% of applicants. In 2003 it was 64.9%. In 2002 it was 71.4%. That admission rate makes TCU as the second most selective university in the state, after Rice. It's a lower admission rate than SMU, Baylor, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, UH, and UNT.

The 2004 freshman class numbers approximately 1,620 (exact final number still to come), which is the largest freshman class in TCU history. It is not only the largest, but the most accomplished. The average SAT score was 1175. (In 2003 it was 1168. In 2002 it was 1134.) The average high school class rank of these freshmen was #20.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:18 am
by regis
Six-in-a-row is nothing. SMU beat the froggies 15 consecutive from '72-'86 and 19-out-of-21 if you go back to '66.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:20 am
by TCU OWNS SMU
This is 2004, not 1966. I only wish it was 1935, when TCU was ranked #2 and SMU ranked #1...SMU won the game but later lost in Bowl game and TCU won bowl game finishing as National Champions.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:23 am
by Hoofbeat83
dude you are smokin' some kind of ft. worth crack cocaine. tcu never has been and is not now the academic equivalent of SMU.

you've got a superior football program at this point in time, i'll admit. but please be as honest with yourself man. any one of us could have gone to tcu and i bet most of us didn't even consider it. i didn't even know where it was (and still not really sure :)

Re:

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:27 am
by TCU OWNS SMU
Hoofbeat83 wrote:dude you are smokin' some kind of ft. worth crack cocaine. tcu never has been and is not now the academic equivalent of SMU.
but please be as honest with yourself man. any one of us could have gone to tcu and i bet most of us didn't even consider it. i didn't even know where it was (and still not really sure :)



Great supporting facts to your point. Well I guess you were #20 in your graduating class and had better than 1200, but most of your SMU classmates didn't....and therefore were passed over by TCU. These are the simple facts. To make you feel better, SMU has much better grad schools, but that's not saying much. As for undergrad, it has become very clear who is superior.

Re:

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:27 am
by surething
Hoofbeat83 wrote:dude you are smokin' some kind of ft. worth crack cocaine. tcu never has been and is not now the academic equivalent of SMU.

you've got a superior football program at this point in time, i'll admit. but please be as honest with yourself man. any one of us could have gone to tcu and i bet most of us didn't even consider it. i didn't even know where it was (and still not really sure :)


Last time i checked TCU and SMU were ranked in the same tier according to US News......................we don't even need to discuss football rankings do we

Re:

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:29 am
by TCU OWNS SMU
Hoofbeat83 wrote:any one of us could have gone to tcu and i bet most of us didn't even consider it. i didn't even know where it was (and still not really sure :)



I wouldn't start defending your education by saying "I live in Dallas but am not really sure where Ft. Worth is"

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:33 am
by Hoofbeat83
dude, go to class.