One is hard pressed to see the point in having a cheating program. Let’s assume that SMU did get back to cheating. What would be the ultimate results? Very little. We don't have the infrastructure to support a cheating program. The alums willing to fork over the cash, the more sophisticated financial schemes needed to avoid detection, the pathetic academic programs to keep well paid athletes eligible (this one is really tough. SMU can have a BFA in dance but nothing that a football/basketball/etc athlete can pony up to) and the will to cheat are key components that SMU doesn't have. Without an adequate infrastructure, the scheme to cheat will not produce the desired results.
About the best thing to come out of an effort to cheat at this time would be the upset posters that want to fire the cheating alums because we aren't buying the best athletes or can’t keep our professionals in school. One or two loses and there would be threads like "Fire the blundering Bs, Blount, Bennett, & Bopeland." Hours of entertaining reading would follow but we would still be unproductive in football. And lets face it, UT and TX A$M would turn us in a heart beat. And the NCAA couldn’t wait to pound its chest like Tarzan and slap us with triple witching death penalty.
The days of buying professional athletes to compete with other colligate professional athletes are over. We need to find a working model that allows us to be competitive and have the best graduation rate in the nation!
