Page 1 of 1
So much for people boycotting Dickerson...

Posted:
Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:47 am
by Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex
Found this on sportsillustrated's web site. Check out who is the #2 player for Retro jerseys.
Fame is fickle. Compare the top-selling NFL jerseys now and five years ago and only Favre's remains a fave. But Donovan McNabb -- ninth on today's list -- seems to have the celeb vote.
TOP JERSEYS 1999
1. BRETT FAVRE
Packers
2. TROY AIKMAN
Cowboys
3. RANDY MOSS
Vikings
4. PEYTON MANNING
Colts
5. TERRELL DAVIS
Broncos
TOP JERSEYS 2004
1. MICHAEL VICK
Falcons, $230
2. TERRELL OWENS
Eagles, $250
3. BRETT FAVRE
Packers, $170
4. BRIAN URLACHER
Bears, $200
5. ELI MANNING
Giants, $200
TOP RETRO JERSEYS '04
1. LAWRENCE TAYLOR
1986 Giants, $260
2. ERIC DICKERSON
1985 L.A. Rams, $300
3. DERRICK THOMAS
1994 Chiefs, $300
4. LAWRENCE TAYLOR
1990 Giants, $260
5. STEVE YOUNG
1985 Buccaneers, $240
Source for current jerseys is NFLShop.com. Prices are for authentic, not replica, jerseys and may increase for extremely large sizes. Source for retro jerseys is Mitchell & Ness Nostalgia Co.

Posted:
Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:38 am
by Lamont_Cranston
Sure would be nice if the SMU Spirit Shop were to carry some 'retro' jerseys of famous SMU players: Walker, Rote, LeVias, etc. I'd buy 'em!

Posted:
Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:37 am
by EastStang
Ya think ED would allow us to us his name on a jersey without being paid?

Posted:
Fri Nov 12, 2004 11:26 am
by Mike Damone
Ya think any of them would?

Posted:
Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:15 pm
by EastStang
LeVias, Walker and Rote were pre name on jersey era players, just their numbers are needed. We all know who 37 is. But I think LeVias would consent without blinking. I don't thing ED would. So perhaps just a #19 royal blue SMU jersey is all that would be needed.
Re: So much for people boycotting Dickerson...

Posted:
Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:50 pm
by Sir Trolls A Lot
Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex wrote:Found this on sportsillustrated's web site. Check out who is the #2 player for Retro jerseys.
TOP RETRO JERSEYS '04
1. LAWRENCE TAYLOR
1986 Giants, $260
2. ERIC DICKERSON
1985 L.A. Rams, $300
3. DERRICK THOMAS
1994 Chiefs, $300
4. LAWRENCE TAYLOR
1990 Giants, $260
5. STEVE YOUNG
1985 Buccaneers, $240
Peruna,
I agree with you that LBL's boycot is rather silly. However, just from my own cultural vantage point, I doubt that it is SMU grads that are buying the retro jerseys. It does not seem to me like the retro jersey demographic lines up with the SMU demographic.
Sir
Re: So much for people boycotting Dickerson...

Posted:
Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:37 am
by Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex
Sir Trolls A Lot wrote:Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex wrote:Found this on sportsillustrated's web site. Check out who is the #2 player for Retro jerseys.
TOP RETRO JERSEYS '04
1. LAWRENCE TAYLOR
1986 Giants, $260
2. ERIC DICKERSON
1985 L.A. Rams, $300
3. DERRICK THOMAS
1994 Chiefs, $300
4. LAWRENCE TAYLOR
1990 Giants, $260
5. STEVE YOUNG
1985 Buccaneers, $240
Peruna,
I agree with you that LBL's boycot is rather silly. However, just from my own cultural vantage point, I doubt that it is SMU grads that are buying the retro jerseys. It does not seem to me like the retro jersey demographic lines up with the SMU demographic.
Sir
I wasn't trying to make the assertion that SMU grads are buying the Dickerson retro jerseys just as I seriously doubt that everyone who is a tar heel alum buys a Lawrence Taylor jersey. My reason for posting this was that I just found it rather interesting that ED's jersey is a top seller and thought I would tie it with the "boycott" post that was made earlier this week.
Re: So much for people boycotting Dickerson...

Posted:
Sat Nov 13, 2004 7:59 am
by Sir Trolls A Lot
Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex wrote:I wasn't trying to make the assertion that SMU grads are buying the Dickerson retro jerseys just as I seriously doubt that everyone who is a tar heel alum buys a Lawrence Taylor jersey. My reason for posting this was that I just found it rather interesting that ED's jersey is a top seller and thought I would tie it with the "boycott" post that was made earlier this week.
Man, will you please change your signature? It is worse than that picture of Kathy Bates.
Go Stangs!!

Posted:
Sat Nov 13, 2004 8:49 am
by RGV Pony
Anyone notice that on all of the retro ED jerseys, the color is right, the number is right, the name is right, but turn it around and...guess what? No SMU on the front.
Can anyone tell me what the deal is with SMU refusing to license stuff? I can't tell you the number of times I've shopped for apparel and the like, and after seeing Baylor stuff, Texas stuff, aTm stuff, hell even UH stuff, I ask why they don't have SMU & they say SMU is hard to get stuff from because they don't generally license as much as the other schools.
Re: So much for people boycotting Dickerson...

Posted:
Sat Nov 13, 2004 2:21 pm
by Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex
Sir Trolls A Lot wrote:Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex wrote:I wasn't trying to make the assertion that SMU grads are buying the Dickerson retro jerseys just as I seriously doubt that everyone who is a tar heel alum buys a Lawrence Taylor jersey. My reason for posting this was that I just found it rather interesting that ED's jersey is a top seller and thought I would tie it with the "boycott" post that was made earlier this week.
Man, will you please change your signature? It is worse than that picture of Kathy Bates.
Go Stangs!!
No, I think I will keep it.
Re: So much for people boycotting Dickerson...

Posted:
Sat Nov 13, 2004 2:36 pm
by Sir Trolls A Lot
Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex wrote:No, I think I will keep it.
Fine,
I just don't think it is good to stereotype the players as stupid. At least give the name of the player who asked you to play "dat song."
Sir

Posted:
Sun Nov 14, 2004 1:45 pm
by Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex
Um, sure. Whatever. You can go back to trolling now.