LIES?

With 20 returning starters, that would mean that very FEW seniors were starters last year, an indication of youth.
Seems pretty accurate so far.
The fact that 20 starters return actually CONFIRMS that this team was young last year.
EVERY roster across the country includes walkons .
No misinformation here. All you can accuse the administration of is using information in the best light possible.
- Sort of like when they say 20 starters are returning, when you also know that not ALL of those 20 will be the starters anyway. It's just a general way to make general tendencies when you compare teams.
THAT'S ALL IT WAS. SMU was one of the youngest teams last year.
The fact that 20 starters return actually CONFIRMS that this team was young last year.
If you read further, the STARTERS that are returning this FALL are mostly JRs and SOPHs, so again, how was this team NOT young??
Now, that doesn't mean they were good, bad, or ugly. W's and L's will play that out in '05 and '06.
Seems pretty accurate so far.
The fact that 20 starters return actually CONFIRMS that this team was young last year.
EVERY roster across the country includes walkons .
No misinformation here. All you can accuse the administration of is using information in the best light possible.
- Sort of like when they say 20 starters are returning, when you also know that not ALL of those 20 will be the starters anyway. It's just a general way to make general tendencies when you compare teams.
THAT'S ALL IT WAS. SMU was one of the youngest teams last year.
The fact that 20 starters return actually CONFIRMS that this team was young last year.
If you read further, the STARTERS that are returning this FALL are mostly JRs and SOPHs, so again, how was this team NOT young??
Now, that doesn't mean they were good, bad, or ugly. W's and L's will play that out in '05 and '06.