PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Money Grab?

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Money Grab?

Postby Water Pony » Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:19 pm

From CNN/SI:

1. NCAA presidents approved the addition of a 12th regular season football game, but they have no interest in a playoff. Am I missing something?

If you are, you're not alone. The 12th game is a curious and contradictory addition. Even as Division I-A university presidents wax eloquent about the importance of taking control of oversized football and basketball programs, they add a game to the football schedule. Even as they refuse to consider implementing a playoff that would solve the sport's championship mess, on the grounds that it would send an inappropriate message about the relationship between education and sport, they approve lengthening the season.

Know this: The 12th game is a money grab. Most power programs will use the extra contest to schedule a seventh -- and in some cases, an eighth -- home game in their mammoth stadiums, thus pocketing several million dollars in revenue to help balance their precarious athletic budgets. Most smaller I-A programs will use it to go play a power program and collect a six- or seven-figure paycheck for getting the snot beat out of them, also helping fund their impoverished programs. When I visited South Bend, Ind., in March for a story on rookie Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis, it was explained to me that the Irish are building an entirely new scheduling policy around the addition of another home game. The 12th game will produce a bunch of money, a lot of lousy games and an occasional upset.

Meanwhile, a playoff would also produce big dollars, several weeks of terrific games and probably heart-stopping upsets every year. Oh, and also, an undisputed national champion. Of course, we have never been further from any kind of playoff. At this point it seems just as likely that when the new BCS contract with FOX Sports expires in 2010, college football will return to the old free-for-all bowl system, with only occasional No. 1-vs.-No. 2 matchups. (Unless, of course, FOX can somehow induce a post-bowl, plus-one game, which thus far the presidents have not been willing to consider, either). Sadly, presidents have chosen to stand and fight their ideological battle on the issue of a playoff. It is the simplest, most public manner in which to show their concern for academic values, even as they run quasi-minor league football programs for the NFL.

:shock:
Pony Up
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5512
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Postby MrMustang1965 » Sun Jun 05, 2005 4:50 pm

For all of you folks who believe that SMU should be playing Div. 1-AA football instead of Div. 1-A, you can now have your wish of them also playing in a division where there actually IS a national champion! :roll:
User avatar
MrMustang1965
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Dallas,TX,USA

Postby jtstang » Sun Jun 05, 2005 6:05 pm

MrMustang1965 wrote:For all of you folks who believe that SMU should be playing Div. 1-AA football instead of Div. 1-A, you can now have your wish of them also playing in a division where there actually IS a national champion! :roll:

What's wrong with that?
User avatar
jtstang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby giacfsp » Sun Jun 05, 2005 6:38 pm

I'd rather have my team play in the NFL then win the ArenaBowl (or whatever it's called). Moving to I-AA is the collegiate version of the same thing.
User avatar
giacfsp
Heisman
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests