PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Friday's DMN

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Friday's DMN

Postby Corso » Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:23 am

The paper reported that Romo doesn't feel "additional pressure" in his first start. That's good, I suppose -- clenching up doesn't help when facing a group like the froggie D. The paper also quotes Romo as saying we're going to "open it up a little bit." YES!

Beyond that, it also said Alvin Nnabuife won't play on special teams. Was he worn out in the first game?
User avatar
Corso
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2820
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Richardson, Texas

Postby SMU Football Blog » Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:35 am

I don't know what the heck he's talking about. "Open it up?" That is gibberish. We were lining up five wide, with a RB split wide. That isn't opening it up? We ran a hurry up offense. That isn't opening it up?

The offense, when it was effective, looks no different than the offense from late 2003: handoff-draw-single read, tuck and run. But now we use Romo instead of Phillips. You can flip to teh back of the playbook all you want, but if the players can't execute, what is the point? Maybe if we weren't splitting the offensive plays 45-45-10 among three quarterbacks, we could execute better.
User avatar
SMU Football Blog
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: North Dallas, Texas

Postby Corso » Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:38 am

I read his comment about opening it up to mean that they would throw the ball more. We had wide receivers on the team when Kincade was running 50 times a game, too, but every team we faced knew he was getting the ball on nearly every play. A few early passes to Cleveland, Chase, Pellerin, Kennedy, etc., might push the TCU defense back a little.

But you're right, we won't see a lot of Hawaii-esque gimmick plays.
User avatar
Corso
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2820
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Richardson, Texas

Postby Grider » Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:24 am

Man, I hate to jump on the negativity bandwagon, but it seems like I've heard this "now we're going to open it up a little more" comment several times in the past. Hopefully they mean it this time. I think it's the only way we'll have a chance against TCU.
User avatar
Grider
All-American
 
Posts: 701
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Lufkin, TX

Postby SWC2010 » Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:28 am

If 'open it up' means going vertical with the passing game- I'm all for it. We need to pass down the field & over the middle with less passes into the flats. And get Kennedy in the offense.
SWC2010
Heisman
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: TEXAS

Postby WorldStang » Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:58 am

When he says.. "we're going to open it up" he's referring to all the alcohol the fans will be drinking prior to the game on the Boulevard.

Come on ! Don't you guys know anything! :lol:

Let's go SMU.. I'll open one up to that!
What we obtain too cheap.. we esteem too lightly. It is persistence alone that gives everything its value.
User avatar
WorldStang
All-American
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Allen, TX

Postby smupony » Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:03 am

Yes!! Open up the middle!! Show us how a spread offense is suppose to operate!!

I only saw one pass go to a slant. I think it was to Bobby Chase. Aren't slants and three step drops the entire basis of this offense?
User avatar
smupony
All-American
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 4:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby EastStang » Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:23 am

The Raiders hung 70 on these guys last year. OU had open receivers down field the entire day last week and couldn't hit them or when they did hit them, they dropped the ball. Hopefully if our line can hold the out long enough, we can go vertical on them and get some scores. I suspect they'll be throwing their two running backs at us without mercy with Gunn throwing long if we cheat to the line. On defense they'll probably stack the line daring us to throw the ball, just like they did with OU. We have to make them pay for that.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12664
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Postby abezontar » Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:56 pm

what, in the is history of Bennett's tenure, makes you think that even if we try to go vertical we will be able to hit the receivers, and then have the receivers hold on to the ball
The donkey's name is Kiki.

On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?

Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
User avatar
abezontar
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3888
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Mustang, TX

Postby me@smu » Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:29 pm

Got to love that we are starting the QB who is generally considered the worst passer of the three in a game we are going to open it up and go vertical...
User avatar
me@smu
Heisman
 
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:03 am
Location: Dallas

Postby Pony_Fan » Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:52 pm

me@smu wrote:Got to love that we are starting the QB who is generally considered the worst passer of the three in a game we are going to open it up and go vertical...


that makes me chuckle...good post!
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Postby PK » Fri Sep 09, 2005 2:12 pm

me@smu wrote:Got to love that we are starting the QB who is generally considered the worst passer of the three in a game we are going to open it up and go vertical...
No where did he say we were going vertical...he just said we were going to open it up. Everyone just assumes that means vertical. Surely we have a number of running plays we haven't used yet...surely.
User avatar
PK
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 8805
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas 75206

Postby KnuckleStang » Fri Sep 09, 2005 2:25 pm

me@smu wrote:Got to love that we are starting the QB who is generally considered the worst passer of the three in a game we are going to open it up and go vertical...


I agree that's funny...except for the fact that Romo is not our worst passer. Eckert is. It's not even close. The guy was a veritable one-man interception factory last year, and against Baylor he was the worst quarterback I have ever seen in my life.

And honestly, I don't see what CP has ever done through the air to say he's a better passer than Romo. I was at the 2003 Rice game, which was arguably Phillips' best outing? Both guys are average passers at best, with a knack for making something happen while running for their lives. CP and Romo are more alike as quarterbacks, in terms of what they've done in games, than many on this board would care to admit.
User avatar
KnuckleStang
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2605
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Lynchburg, VA, USA


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests