Leach Going for 100
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:12 pmTexas Tech up 49-7 at halftime against MrBobcat1965's alma mater.
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:12 pmPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:33 pm59-7 with 9:33 left in 3rd Q.
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:35 pmThat's funny, Stallion. Isn't it Mr.Bearkat (sic), though?
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:59 pm66-7 with 2 1/2 minutes left in 3rd Q.
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:00 pmDear Lord. And we play these guys next year? Well both teams next year 
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:34 pm80-14 with 6 minutes left-I'm sure that Tech's 2 minute offense still needs some tune-up.
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:35 pm80-14 with 6 minutes left-I'm sure that Tech 2 minute offense still needs some tune-up.
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:36 pmAtleast they score 14?
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:41 pmUT will nail Tech this year. Loading their schedule with pasties will catch up with them.
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:44 pmdupe post
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:52 pmTriple post
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 9:33 amThe Leach is such a classless [deleted]. I would never want my child to play for a "man" like him.
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 9:39 amThis guy is as big a chump as Jack Pardee. What comes around.........
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:33 pmI know most of you won't care about this...but just so you know... our third stringers were in by the end of the 3rd... its not like we were throwing our starters at them till the end.
It was a game that never should have been scheduled....but as someone that always cheers for SMU as well I wonder why it is that you consider what Tech did to SHSU is worse than what aTm did to SMU. Seems to me that McNeal should have come out ALOT earlier than he did and that 66 points weren't necessary... Just some food for thought....
It was a game that never should have been scheduled....but as someone that always cheers for SMU as well I wonder why it is that you consider what Tech did to SHSU is worse than what aTm did to SMU. Seems to me that McNeal should have come out ALOT earlier than he did and that 66 points weren't necessary... Just some food for thought....
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:54 pmYeah, he's a [deleted]. I was howling for Coach to take him last year after the TT game.
But he has also figured out the bowl formula:
- Blow out 3 small schools, then only need to win 3 conference games to be bowl eligible.
He's smart enough to know he can't whip UT, A&M, & OU in the same season. So, he has no chance for XII Champ; but the $$$ Alums can live with an exciting team that bowls each season.
But he has also figured out the bowl formula:
- Blow out 3 small schools, then only need to win 3 conference games to be bowl eligible.
He's smart enough to know he can't whip UT, A&M, & OU in the same season. So, he has no chance for XII Champ; but the $$$ Alums can live with an exciting team that bowls each season.