Page 1 of 2
TCU Frogs @ #25?

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:08 am
by MrMustang1965
You gotta be kiddin' me, right?
Remember: SMU 21, #22 TCU 10

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:36 am
by friarwolf
I think we should all be pulling for TCU to go undefeated the rest of the season and climb as high as possible in the rankings.

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:46 am
by lugus830
I was suprised that TCU climbed back up, but the higher they go the better it looks for us that we beat them.
What I REALLY can't believe is that Tech is #11 in the USA Today Poll and #13 in the AP.
I know that they are undefeated but they beat 2 1-AA teams and a 1-A team that is one of the worst in the country. Heck if SMU stacked thier shedule the same way we would've been 3-0 after starting as well.
Don't get me wrong they deserve to be ranked, but a little high considering if you ask me.
Oh well, they will drop at least 2 games by the end of the season anyway. They should've lost one already. They should be sending thank you letters to the DT from Nebraska.

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:49 pm
by BUTitan
Don't forget Baylor has a vote for the AP Poll !?!?!?!?!?!

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:52 pm
by FroggieFever
Yep!

, my Pony friend. I predict, IMOO, that we will place #13 at the end of the regular season... we'll see.

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:12 pm
by WorldStang
FrogieFever wrote:Yep!

, my Pony friend. I predict, IMOO, that we will place #13 at the end of the regular season... we'll see.
Frogs would have BCS shot had it not been for the Mustangs. Too bad we shot your wheels off frogs..

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:17 pm
by FroggieFever
You're right... too bad. We were due up after six years of domination...

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:38 pm
by LakeHighlandsPony
Frogs have done a great job this year after the SMU game. I really do give then credit.

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:44 pm
by MrMustang1965
lugus830 wrote:I know that they are undefeated but they beat 2 1-AA teams and a 1-A team that is one of the worst in the country. Heck if SMU stacked their schedule the same way we would've been 3-0 after starting as well.
Ummm...I guess you hadn't heard. SMU's 2006 schedule has 2 Div. 1-AA teams on it (Sam Houston State and Texas State - San Marcos) already.


Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:45 pm
by Hoofbeat83
FrogieFever wrote:You're right... too bad. We were due up after six years of domination...
21-10 tadpole. hop along.
and you really, really need to change your signature. there is no way tcu is going to the bcs with a loss to SMU. if you think otherwise, your degree from tcu doesn't say much about the quality of education in FW.

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:57 pm
by jtstang
lugus830 wrote:I know that they are undefeated but they beat 2 1-AA teams and a 1-A team that is one of the worst in the country. Heck if SMU stacked thier shedule the same way we would've been 3-0 after starting as well.
That's seriously doubtful.

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:18 pm
by lugus830
MrMustang1965 wrote:lugus830 wrote:I know that they are undefeated but they beat 2 1-AA teams and a 1-A team that is one of the worst in the country. Heck if SMU stacked their schedule the same way we would've been 3-0 after starting as well.
Ummm...I guess you hadn't heard. SMU's 2006 schedule has 2 Div. 1-AA teams on it (Sam Houston State and Texas State - San Marcos) already.

2-0 non-conference in '06, here we come!

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:34 pm
by FroggieFever
Hoofbeat83 wrote:FrogieFever wrote:You're right... too bad. We were due up after six years of domination...
21-10 tadpole. hop along.
and you really, really need to change your signature. there is no way tcu is going to the bcs with a loss to SMU. if you think otherwise, your degree from tcu doesn't say much about the quality of education in FW.
Go Frogs!

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:41 pm
by MrMustang1965
FrogieFever wrote:Hoofbeat83 wrote:FrogieFever wrote:You're right... too bad. We were due up after six years of domination...
21-10 tadpole. hop along.
and you really, really need to change your signature. there is no way tcu is going to the bcs with a loss to SMU. if you think otherwise, your degree from tcu doesn't say much about the quality of education in FW.
It's unfortunate I didn't attend Texas Christian... I really wish I had applied there... instead, I graduated Harvard; C/O 2000, and with that, am an avid fan of the Horned Frogs.
Go Frogs!
*LOL* Shouldn't you be cheering for SMU? It's known as 'The Harvard of the South'!

Posted:
Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:55 pm
by Nacho
TCU is the SMU of the west, only they have a better football team (except we beat them this year) and they aren't as good academically. SMU is recognized by US News &WR for having top programs in Business and Fine Arts. TCU--nada, senor toad. Nothing exceptional about TCU as an academic institution I'm afraid. It's not a bad school. It's just not SMU. Harvard is another matter. Where did you live in Boston?