Come on Calvin
Posted:
Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:33 amby LakeHighlandsPony
Since when did Iowa State become one of the "Big Boys"? Georgia, Texas, USC and Michigan are a few of what I call the Big Boys. I don't see how TCU beating Iowa State would "make a case for the BCS" next year.
Re: Come on Calvin
Posted:
Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:40 amby PhirePhilBennett
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:Since when did Iowa State become one of the "Big Boys"? Georgia, Texas, USC and Michigan are a few of what I call the Big Boys. I don't see how TCU beating Iowa State would "make a case for the BCS" next year.
he must be confusing them with
iowa (btw, isu beat iowa this year)
Posted:
Sat Dec 31, 2005 6:23 pmby PonySnob
TCU is certainly more competitive with Big 12 teams than we are right now.
Re: Come on Calvin
Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:58 pmby SWC2010
LakeHighlandsPony wrote: I don't see how TCU beating Iowa State would "make a case for the BCS" next year.
----
tcwho does have a chance for BCS next year-- they DON'T play SMU next year:
21-10
Posted:
Mon Jan 02, 2006 4:16 pmby Original Frank
Hello Frog Snob! Your post above is vintage Frog Snob! Your blind TCU bias shows through as a beacon of light!
Actually, I thought you had disappeared after the Dec. 30 b-ball game much like you disappeard after the Sept. 10 football game. Man, you really disappear when your beloved froggies roll-over against SMU. And now it has happened over and over again. I have hailed you on the b-ball board but I can't seem to get you to come on over. I understand, it must be tough to be a cross-town-whipping-boy in both revenue-producing sports. But to be such a coward, shame on you!
Your point may be true that TCU is more competitive in football with Big 12 schools, but SMU has now proven itself "more competitive" than your froggies on the field of play in the only two revenue-producing sports.
Ouch! It's tough to be the second best team in a two-team Metroplex!
Have a great day, Frog Snob!