PREDICT THE SCORE AND 'NO WAGERING', PLEASE!

USC 33
U.T. 24
U.T. 24
SMU Fan Site
http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/
that's great raplh wrote:who wants to wager?
You're right -- USC hasn't seen a defense as good as UT's. However, to suggest that USC has no defense is wrong -- the Trojans led the nation in takeaways. They might not be smothering (see Fresno State game, for instance), but they definitely are a legit defense. And yes, UT has a good offense.PhirePhilBennett wrote:TEXAS by 21
UT 38-17 USC
Arguments for:
a) USC hasn't seen a defense close to TEXAS
b) USC has no defense
c) UT has an offense
You forgot LenDale White, Dwayne Jarrett, Steve (I think) Smith, some guy named Leinart (who also has a Heisman on his shelf) and, in my opinion, the best coach in the country.PhirePhilBennett wrote:Arguments against:
a) USC has played in now their 3rd straight Nat'l Champ game
Therefore:
b) Texas will be tight / USC will be lose
c) REGGIE BUSH
Unheralded? Everyone's calling Ramonce Taylor "the other Reggie Bush," Henry Melton is being touted as "the next Jerome Bettis" and Jamaal Charles has replaced Adrian Peterson as the most heralded freshman RB in the country. They're excellent, but USC has the horses to replicate them in practice more than UT has the guys to replicate Bush and White in practice.PhirePhilBennett wrote:Sur-rebuttal:
a) Texas played in the Rose Bowl last year, and it is now familiar turf.
b) Vince Young + those unheralded excellent RBs
The 'hell of a game' title goes to the Orange Bowl, right now. TRIPLE OT!PonyTales wrote:You're right, it's not USC circa '03 or '04 -- but they're better than UT.
I hope.
Should be a hell of a game.