PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Be Proud of Texas

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Be Proud of Texas

Postby PhirePhilBennett » Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:07 pm

So goes Texas, so goes Texas-state football.

This is good for us and every school in Texas (read: you can stay in state and accomplish great things).

The more students want to stay in Texas to go to Texas (with only 25 to give), the more EVERYONE will stay in Texas.
PhirePhilBennett
 

Postby KickedintheDingDing » Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:13 pm

agreed
KickedintheDingDing
Recruit
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:12 pm

Postby covok48 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:25 am

Amen to that.

Although I do hate it when Aggies and Sand Aggies whine about how UT winning the Nat'l Championship will hurt their recruiting efforts (oh yeah, like ya'll haven't played second & third fiddle to UT since football began here)
---------------

"If you don't invest very much, then defeat doesn't hurt very much and winning isn't very exciting." -- [deleted] Vermeil
User avatar
covok48
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:42 am

Postby Hoop Fan » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:35 am

its a nice sounding theory and all, and I'd like it to be true, but I dont think there is anything to it, for SMU at least. They are recruiting in a different stratasphere. No way of ever proving or disproving it though. Its like trickle down economic theory. Republicans buy it, Democrats don't.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Postby mrydel » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:41 am

Although they came in second, I kind of like the idea of appreciating a relatively small private school in a major metropolitan area following a model that has allowed them to become a true power in Div 1 football regardless of the State in which they play. Tis the model that does not allow us to compete for recruits first, BCS second.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby KickedintheDingDing » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:56 am

Hoop Fan wrote:its a nice sounding theory and all, and I'd like it to be true, but I dont think there is anything to it, for SMU at least. They are recruiting in a different stratasphere. No way of ever proving or disproving it though. Its like trickle down economic theory. Republicans buy it, Democrats don't.


You forget the vast wasteland that the SWC became when all our best recruits left the state because we only had aTm as a standard bearer.
KickedintheDingDing
Recruit
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:12 pm

Postby EastStang » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:05 am

I totally disagree with this. What's good for UT is good for UT, then the Big XII, then the BCS and certainly not CUSA schools. If we were still in the same conference with them, I would tend to agree with that statement. But not now. Those that UT turns down will flock to other Big XII schools to be able to say that they played against the Horns.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12665
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Postby Hoop Fan » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:21 am

EastStang wrote:I totally disagree with this. What's good for UT is good for UT, then the Big XII, then the BCS and certainly not CUSA schools. If we were still in the same conference with them, I would tend to agree with that statement. But not now. Those that UT turns down will flock to other Big XII schools to be able to say that they played against the Horns.


exactly.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Postby PhirePhilBennett » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:28 am

Hoop Fan wrote:
EastStang wrote:I totally disagree with this. What's good for UT is good for UT, then the Big XII, then the BCS and certainly not CUSA schools. If we were still in the same conference with them, I would tend to agree with that statement. But not now. Those that UT turns down will flock to other Big XII schools to be able to say that they played against the Horns.


exactly.


They can only take 25 a year
PhirePhilBennett
 

Postby No Cal Pony » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:32 am

i think the other big xii schools can, and do, take more than 25.

Go Ponies!
User avatar
No Cal Pony
Varsity
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Hillsborough, NC

Postby Hoop Fan » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:34 am

I realize that. And the scholarship limits were in place last year too, and 10 years ago. UT being strong just doesnt help SMU these days. If anything the Big 12 hype hurts because it helps the schools we do recruit against like Kansas, Missouri, Baylor and Iowa State.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Postby EastStang » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:38 am

Didn't you hear the BCS wants to increase the number of scholarships? That would lock up more players. If each Big XII school in Texas took 25 players out of the Top 100, guess what, there goes the top Texas 100. If OU took a few, OSU took a few, LSU took a few, Arkansas took a few, KU, MU, KSU, CU all took a few, you're closing in on the Top 200. What's left? Toaster leavins for SMU, Rice, UTEP, Tulsa, TCU, UH.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12665
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Postby No Cal Pony » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:54 am

exactly east, not to mention the other schools that come in and pick up kids, like georgia,lsu, usc, ucla, come to mind. SMU has to look elsewhere too.

Go Ponies!
User avatar
No Cal Pony
Varsity
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Hillsborough, NC

Postby Hoop Fan » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:56 am

No Cal Pony wrote:exactly east, not to mention the other schools that come in and pick up kids, like georgia, usc, ucla, come to mind. SMU has to look elsewhere too.

Go Ponies!


dont forget Arizona, they are a major player with the second tier players in the area. By second tier I mean the lower half of the state and area top 100s.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Postby ALEX LIFESON » Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:04 pm

Besides the cash, does it do Baylor etc..... any good, when UT is pounding their brains out 62 to zip next year? The rich get richer, thats all pal!
User avatar
ALEX LIFESON
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11387
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: GARLAND

Next

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests