Page 1 of 1

Does Anybody Really Give a Rats [deleted] About VY's Wonderlic?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:01 pm
by SMUstang
What is really important here?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:04 pm
by LonghornFan68
Nope. *Stares lovingly at the Sears Trophy background on his puter*

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:38 pm
by Corso
YOU are allowed to, LF68. That's forgivable. (Disgusting, but forgivable. :wink: )

But how about a favor: take the corporate putridness out of it, and just call it the championship trophy or something? I always cringe when I hear Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, Nokia Sugar Bowl, etc.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:40 pm
by jtstang
Corso wrote:YOU are allowed to, LF68. That's forgivable. (Disgusting, but forgivable. :wink: )

But how about a favor: take the corporate putridness out of it, and just call it the championship trophy or something? I always cringe when I hear Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, Nokia Sugar Bowl, etc.

My god, what about the incessant crowing on this site when SMU is in the running for the Sears Cup thanks to its outstanding Equestrian season?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:41 pm
by ponydawg
anything to make the work day go by faster....
I enjoy watching people b*tch about it more on here than the actual story.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:59 pm
by PonyPride
jtstang wrote:My god, what about the incessant crowing on this site when SMU is in the running for the Sears Cup thanks to its outstanding Equestrian season?
From my perspective, at least, it's OK then (although frankly, I'd rather see it as just the Academic Cup, or some other non-commercial name, too). But if SMU looks good, that changes the rules. :wink:

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:01 pm
by LonghornFan68
PonyPride wrote:
jtstang wrote:My god, what about the incessant crowing on this site when SMU is in the running for the Sears Cup thanks to its outstanding Equestrian season?
From my perspective, at least, it's OK then (although frankly, I'd rather see it as just the Academic Cup, or some other non-commercial name, too). But if SMU looks good, that changes the rules.


Hehe.

Re: Does Anybody Really Give a Rats [deleted] About VY's Wonderlic?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:19 pm
by StangEsq
SMUstang wrote:What is really important here?


News flash: NFL defensive schemes are slightly more complex than college defenses. You also have to process what you see and make faster decisions because the speed of the game is faster. Dumbasses are at a disadvantage as NFL QBs.

If he really scored a 6, that should raise a red flag. That would make him one of the "dumbest" (according to the test) players ever to take the test... even dumber than sebastian janikowski and jeff george.

If true, it would also make you wonder how he ever passed any courses at TU... of course, we won't ever find out about that stuff.

Re: Does Anybody Really Give a Rats [deleted] About VY's Wonderlic

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:34 pm
by LonghornFan68
StangEsq wrote:
SMUstang wrote:What is really important here?


News flash: NFL defensive schemes are slightly more complex than college defenses. You also have to process what you see and make faster decisions because the speed of the game is faster. Dumbasses are at a disadvantage as NFL QBs.

If he really scored a 6, that should raise a red flag. That would make him one of the "dumbest" (according to the test) players ever to take the test... even dumber than sebastian janikowski and jeff george.

If true, it would also make you wonder how he ever passed any courses at TU... of course, we won't ever find out about that stuff.


Man, are you really that far behind? He took/retook the test and got a 16. The 6 was a false number. Moving on.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:34 pm
by mrydel
He can still be on my team. And that's even if I hate the Longhorns IPP!! He is a remarkable athlete that I wish had been a Mustang.

Re: Does Anybody Really Give a Rats [deleted] About VY's Wonderlic

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:46 pm
by StangEsq
LonghornFan68 wrote: Man, are you really that far behind? He took/retook the test and got a 16. The 6 was a false number. Moving on.


Far behind what? Retaking it means it was false?

In any case, the point of my post wasn't about the accuracy of the score but about what scoring a 6 would actually mean.