PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

First Five Games

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

How Many Wins After Five Games?

4
32
71%
3
12
27%
2
1
2%
1--Uh Ohh
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 45

First Five Games

Postby McClown27 » Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:11 am

Sat., Sep. 2 Texas Tech Lubbock, Texas 6:00 PM
Sat., Sep. 9 North Texas Denton, Texas 6:00 PM
Sat., Sep. 16 Sam Houston State Dallas, Texas 7:00 PM
Sat., Sep. 23 Arkansas State Dallas, Texas 7:00 PM
Sat., Sep. 30 Tulane New Orleans, La. 8:00 PM

Now that we have gone to the Bill Snyder schedule, we should get some early wins. I would certify the season as lost if we lose to either SHSU or Ark. St (no offense Mrydel). Realistically, we should be 4-1 or 3-2 going into the UTEP game in El Paso.
Willis to slot receiver!
User avatar
McClown27
Heisman
 
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:07 pm

Postby me@smu » Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:27 am

What, no 5 win option?
User avatar
me@smu
Heisman
 
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:03 am
Location: Dallas

Postby McClown27 » Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:58 am

I'll add it for the big morning drinkers on the board. :P

Couldn't be done, sorry.
Willis to slot receiver!
User avatar
McClown27
Heisman
 
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:07 pm

Postby mrydel » Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:01 am

I do not know where any offense would come in. I have long said we should be no worse than 3-1 in our first 4 games. If we accomplish that, Tulane should be a considered win also. Losing to SHST, Ark St, or NTSU, would be a step way backwards for this program. Thus, if we are 3-1 the loss had better be to TT. If by some miracle there was a win at Tech, then September should be 5-0. I think we have had 1 win in September in the past several years and that has put a downward spin on the remainder of the seasons. This is the year with the soft schedule to turn that around and achieve some forward momentum going into the conference schedule. If This year accomplishes what it is intended to accomplish, recruiting should again begin to rise and more difficult teams should be scheduled to build on the overall program.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby McClown27 » Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:05 am

mrydel wrote:I do not know where any offense would come in.


I was joking about Arkansas St.
Willis to slot receiver!
User avatar
McClown27
Heisman
 
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:07 pm

Postby mrydel » Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:10 am

I think Arkansas State will be a pleasant surprise in the amount of fans they bring. Arkansans like Dallas and it will be a good trip for them. They are also an up and coming program but should be well behind SMU in talent and experience. A loss here would be devastating.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby jtstang » Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:47 am

mrydel wrote: A loss here would be devastating.

Please don't say things like that. This team could lose to anybody (see Tulane last year, in an @ss-whipping by a team displaced and devastated by a hurricane).
User avatar
jtstang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11161
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby DallasDiehard » Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:54 am

Isn't that the same Arkansas State team that hung with Southern Miss in a bowl game? This is not a terrible team. I'm hoping for -- and expecting -- a win, but this is not a layup. They're very fast and athletic, from what I recall in that game.
Rise up, Mustang Nation!
Go SMU!
User avatar
DallasDiehard
Heisman
 
Posts: 1837
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

Postby mrydel » Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:08 pm

On paper from a talent and experience stand point this should be a cakewalk. Listen, I played this game for many years. I understand upsets, bad officiating, off games, etc. I am just saying that all things considered, we should not lose this game. Their best athlete (QB) is gone and their main talent will come from Arkansas. Trust me, they are the #2 team in Arkansas. Our slim pickings in Texas are of a better overall quality than their slim pickings in Arkansas.

I am not saying we can not lose the game. But let me assure you that a loss to Arkie State would be devastating to our program.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby McClown27 » Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:19 pm

mrydel wrote:I am not saying we can not lose the game. But let me assure you that a loss to Arkie State would be devastating to our program.


It would be a terrible omen if we lose that game. How is UNT supposed to be? We are all assuming a victory, but I haven't heard anything about them.
Willis to slot receiver!
User avatar
McClown27
Heisman
 
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:07 pm

Postby mrydel » Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:01 pm

Another major factor in the defeating of Arkansas State is that I have just heard the latest RUMOR that they are changing their name to the "Scarlets". Now if we can not beat the leading character from Gone With The Wind, we need to reevaluate everything. At least they could have gone more masculine and called themselves the Butlers.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby SMU Football Blog » Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:05 pm

Sunbelt has a 15% winning percentage in nonconference games. Sunbelt's record against I-AA is under 50% over the last five years. Overall, I-AA teams lose to I-A teams 87% of the time.

If SMU were to lose one of those three games it would be a disaster, but SMU won't lose those games.
User avatar
SMU Football Blog
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: North Dallas, Texas

Postby mrydel » Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:19 pm

McClown27 wrote:
mrydel wrote:I am not saying we can not lose the game. But let me assure you that a loss to Arkie State would be devastating to our program.


It would be a terrible omen if we lose that game. How is UNT supposed to be? We are all assuming a victory, but I haven't heard anything about them.


Arkansas State won the SunBelt Conference last year beating out UNT. That should let you know my opinion. I will not state it openly because Jtstang just got married and I am afraid if I call another potnetial loss as being devastating he might pull something and be put on the Unable to Perform list.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby Stallion » Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:26 pm

SMU is going to face extremely hostile crowds at Denton and New Orleans(first home game since Katrina) not to mention Lubbock. Through the last 20 years we have rarely even competed well in New Orleans. They are much better than they showed last year as they proved to us. 2-3 is a very possible scenario for those that don't drink the Cool-Aid. Hopefully, we can pull out those games and go 4-1 but I'll say 3-2. But those thinking Denton and New Orleans will be a cakewalk are way off base. As for the Sub-Belt record against Division 1A most of those games were money games against the BCS-care to take a gander at SMU's record against BCS sc hools since the DP-not much better than the Sun Belt and that is reality. SMU is much closer to the Sun Belt than a BCS conference.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Postby The PonyGrad » Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:35 pm

I say 4-1 but 3-2 would not surprise. We have a lot of question marks to fill in. Don't be surprised with some scary games. :shock:
Go Ponies!!
Beat whoever it is we are playing!!

@PonyGrad
User avatar
The PonyGrad
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:01 am
Location: The Colony, TX

Next

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BillgoCU, Google [Bot] and 8 guests