SMU vs. the rest of C-USA

I was listening to college gameday on the ESPN radio on Saturday and Gerry DiNardo (gasp) actually had a good perspective. The topic was NC State, and their coach's performance. DiNardo said that NC State, much like Michigan State, should be happy where there are. Why? Because when you run down the list of the other schools in their conference, ask yourself if each of those schools is doing their job, would NC State be superior to, on a par, or below those schools? For instance, with Michigan State, they would be below Michigan, Iowa, Penn State, Ohio State, above Indiana and Northwestern and perhaps on par with Illinois. That's assuming all those schools are doing their jobs (recruiting, coaching etc.) That means 6-5, 7-5 etc. is about all they could expect (and all that even Nick Saban did at Michigan State).
So let's look at the same thing with SMU. What do you guys think? All things considered, given the city, recruiting base, admissions (a red flag for us), fan support, facilities, where is SMU vs. Conference USA...assuming SMU did everything it was supposed to, and the other schools did everything they were supposed to..
My take:
vs. Tulsa: SMU should be superior to (at least on par with)
vs. Rice: SMU should be superior to
vs. ECU: SMU should be superior to
vs. USM: inferior to
vs. UH: inferior to
vs. Memphis: inferior to
vs. UTEP: inferior to (on basis of ease of transfers; state $$; fan base)
vs. UCF: inferior to (45,000 tickets sold to champ. game in 1 week)
vs. Tulane: on a par with
vs. Marshall: on a par with
vs. UAB: on a par with (facilities at SMU better)
So that's should be superior to 3, on a par with 3, at a disadvantage to 5. That would mean to expect best case just beyond top 5 finish to worse case just out of bottom 5, if everyone (including SMU) does their job. Thoughts?
So let's look at the same thing with SMU. What do you guys think? All things considered, given the city, recruiting base, admissions (a red flag for us), fan support, facilities, where is SMU vs. Conference USA...assuming SMU did everything it was supposed to, and the other schools did everything they were supposed to..
My take:
vs. Tulsa: SMU should be superior to (at least on par with)
vs. Rice: SMU should be superior to
vs. ECU: SMU should be superior to
vs. USM: inferior to
vs. UH: inferior to
vs. Memphis: inferior to
vs. UTEP: inferior to (on basis of ease of transfers; state $$; fan base)
vs. UCF: inferior to (45,000 tickets sold to champ. game in 1 week)
vs. Tulane: on a par with
vs. Marshall: on a par with
vs. UAB: on a par with (facilities at SMU better)
So that's should be superior to 3, on a par with 3, at a disadvantage to 5. That would mean to expect best case just beyond top 5 finish to worse case just out of bottom 5, if everyone (including SMU) does their job. Thoughts?