Page 1 of 1

UT tried to schedule SMU for today

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:16 am
by 03Mustang
Interesting note from Gerry Fraley's article on UT from the DMN today about the Sam Houston St. game today:

Texas tried to take the high road and get a Division I-A opponent for this date. Associate athletic director Butch Worley said he contacted about 40 Division I-A schools, including SMU, over a six-month period but found no takers.

Guess no one wanted to be a punching bag, SMU included. If Copeland was still around he probably would have scheduled this one.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:45 am
by RGV Pony
I'm pretty sure that CUSA would prefer we are playing in New Orleans today.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 10:09 am
by Hoop Fan
that, and UT was offering a measley $275K for the visitors and of course they were unwilling to reciprocate with a home and home. fraley was right to call out UT for scheduling this game.

Re: UT tried to schedule SMU for today

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 10:10 am
by MrMustang1965
03Mustang wrote:Interesting note from Gerry Fraley's article on UT from the DMN today about the Sam Houston St. game today:

Texas tried to take the high road and get a Division I-A opponent for this date. Associate athletic director Butch Worley said he contacted about 40 Division I-A schools, including SMU, over a six-month period but found no takers.

Guess no one wanted to be a punching bag, SMU included. If Copeland was still around he probably would have scheduled this one.
Good god...instead they scheduled my alma mater, Sam Houston State. :roll:

Paycheck = $275,000.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 10:17 am
by RGV Pony
Hoop Fan wrote:that, and UT was offering a measley $275K for the visitors and of course they were unwilling to reciprocate with a home and home. fraley was right to call out UT for scheduling this game.


and Turner Gil's team got 600k to go to Auburn. Man. Scheisters down there in Austin.

Glad SMU decline the offer

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 11:08 am
by Sam I Am
As a double grad of both schools, I have the right to say shame on UT for begin cheapskates and asking for one-sided deals with SMU. Tech and aTm are better deals for us anyway.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:33 pm
by Stallion
yes shame on UT for scheduling Sam Houston St. without offering a return game. How dare they. Once they took strength of schedule out of the BCS equation and allowed these games to count for bowl eligibility the COLLEGE FOOTBALL FAN was shafted. No one can logically look at the situation and lay undue criticism at UT. It is simply out of control throughout college football mainly so the BCS schools can get that extra 1-2 home games. The only ones that can do anything about it are now the TV networks who continue to pay big money for this crap.

Interesting

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:48 pm
by Boston Pony
What is interesting is that other schools and particularly conferences like the PAC 10 & Big 10 that schedule tough games with the same restrictions that are on the Big 12 & UT. Stallion, UT didn't get any takers and moved down as opposed to moving up... they knew that fans would come to whomever they scheduled compared to the other UT (Tennessee) that scheduled Cal (& beat them).