PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

For all of hoopla about Palmer

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

For all of hoopla about Palmer

Postby me@smu » Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:26 am

Considering that every media source has annoited Palmer and UTEPs passing offense as just this side of god...I find it interesting that our lowly little QB has thrown more TDs, less interceptions and has a better QB rating.

All those yards are nice but if you aren't putting the ball in the endzone...they get you no where.
User avatar
me@smu
Heisman
 
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:03 am
Location: Dallas

Postby J.T.supporta » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:59 am

Its all about a respect factor when it comes to getting praise from others in the realm of college football.

Palmer put up great numbers in a close loss to Tx Tech and has played fairly decent programs so far this season.

Willis' numbers are great but when you play SHSTU and stAte you are suppose to put up huge numbers like he did. If Willis can put up those numbers this week like he did against those two teams, I am pretty sure that he will start getting more respect and recognition from more people in college football.
User avatar
J.T.supporta
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6160
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: SMU

Postby me@smu » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:48 pm

Fairly good competition this year?

UTEP has played:
SDSU - which they won despite Palmer's 4 interceptions. SDSU is a powerhouse at 0-4
TT - Had alot of yards, connecting on 63% of passes for 3 tds and 2 ints
NM - Powerhouse program that lost to d1AA portland State but was able to squeeze a win out over another UTEP opponent New Mexico State.
UNMS - Palmer's best game to date despite the 2 ints. UNMS two wins, victories over SE Louisiana and Texas Southern.

Palmer is good but lets not get overly excited about this guy. We have and will face better QBs this year.
User avatar
me@smu
Heisman
 
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:03 am
Location: Dallas

Postby mrydel » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:55 pm

me@smu wrote:Fairly good competition this year?

UTEP has played:
SDSU - which they won despite Palmer's 4 interceptions. SDSU is a powerhouse at 0-4
TT - Had alot of yards, connecting on 63% of passes for 3 tds and 2 ints
NM - Powerhouse program that lost to d1AA portland State but was able to squeeze a win out over another UTEP opponent New Mexico State.
UNMS - Palmer's best game to date despite the 2 ints. UNMS two wins, victories over SE Louisiana and Texas Southern.

Palmer is good but lets not get overly excited about this guy. We have and will face better QBs this year.


And he will face better secondaries. Our best bet is to do what we can on defense, primarily shutting down any type of running attack and do the best we are able on pass defense. Run the ball and used ball control passes as best we are able to maintain the ball a maximum amount of time, and outscore them. I do not invision this as a defensive struggle.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby SMU Football Blog » Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:34 pm

We are going to have some trouble this week. UTEP's offensive weakness is its running game, while stopping the run is what SMU does best. SMU can completely take away their running game and they won't notice.

The key to beating UTEP, as I see it, is to get consistent pressure on Palmer. The interesting thing about Palmer is he forces things. Palmer is rarely sacked, which is odd for a guy considered a pocket passer. He'll throw into coverage to avoid a sack.

New Mexico got good pressure on Palmer for five sacks. Interestingly, Palmer had no interceptions in that game. Reminder, New Mexico won that game.

So, the trick is to get to Palmer without leaving our secondary to hang in the wind. In short, SMU faces a nearly identical problem to the one it faced against Texas Tech. Frankly, our secondary stands a good chance of being exposed.

SMU will be able run on UTEP pretty easily. In fact, I predict they will give up more running yards to SMU than they any of their four previous games.
User avatar
SMU Football Blog
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: North Dallas, Texas

Postby J.T.supporta » Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:46 pm

If SMU can force two quick INTs in the 1st quarter, i see SMU winning in easy fashion.

The winner will be determined with whoever wins the turnover battle.
User avatar
J.T.supporta
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6160
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: SMU

Postby mustangbill67 » Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:09 pm

I read an analysis of the UTEP New Mexico game in a New Mexico paper yesterday. The Lobos beat UTEP by playing hard nosed, physical football on both sides of the ball. After reading the analysis, I am confident this is a game we should win expecially if we can get pressure on the QB.
User avatar
mustangbill67
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby tmustangp » Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:27 pm

we have a better chance of getting pressure on Palmer compared to Harrell b/c UTEP doesn't practice getting rid of the ball quickly and have those huge splits..

from what i remember we still got good pressure on harrell against that Tech Oline..
User avatar
tmustangp
All-American
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 4:01 am
Location: dallas,tx,us


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests