Page 1 of 2

WHY can't you

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:34 pm
by expony18
say anything about the Bush Library?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:54 pm
by that's great raplh
delete this thread

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:10 pm
by smu diamond m
Do deleted threads still raise your post count? :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:30 pm
by PK
No.

Re: WHY can't you

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:46 pm
by mrydel
expony18 wrote:say anything about the Bush Library?


I am glad you ask., because that has become a misconception. There were arguments about various topics from time to time on this board and someone would eventually point out that a particular subject was not related to SMU, or to football, or basketball, etc. It was determined, at least in the general forum that if you were discussing the Bush Library it did pertain to SMU. Thus, whenever something becomes off topic or too argumentative, a mention of Bush Library should be added to keep the subject SMU related.

Bush Library is not a taboo subject nor a deletion magnet, quite the opposite. Now get into politics of Mr. Bush vs. whomever and deletions come quickly.

Bush Library

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:58 pm
by expony18
ahhhh.... its funny bc about 50% of our threads have absolutely nothing to do with foozeball... but i understand the rationale for having threads like that deleted... this site is a grat place for (insider) information, since the team websit is garbage, and the DMN (which i can't get in tulsa) is absolutely terrible its god to have a message board where you can get and give good information... even if the majority of it is BS

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:39 pm
by couch 'em
PK wrote:No.


But they do raise your black horseshoe count.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:38 pm
by J.T.supporta
Didnt Bush player football in college. Yale was it???

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:41 pm
by Treadway21
Bush 41 played baseball at Yale and Bush 43 played rugby.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:52 pm
by J.T.supporta
rugby is a tougher form of football.

No pads FULL contact. no breaks or timeouts.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:53 pm
by couch 'em
J.T.supporta wrote:rugby is a tougher form of football.

No pads FULL contact. no breaks or timeouts.


With smaller people all the same size, with less brutal hits. Football has pads because too many people were getting killed. Football was nearly banned.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:01 pm
by KnuckleStang
Rugby's the roughest of all contact sports. Football is a collision sport.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:06 pm
by Treadway21
Image

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:16 pm
by J.T.supporta
Rugby is as tough as hockey. Just no stick and sharp stakes.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:23 pm
by jtstang
Was Dubya on the real team or just in the rugby reserves?