Page 1 of 1

Did you notice...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:49 am
by peruna81
a couple of things that stood out to me in last night's game:

1) Limited camera shots showing the crowd ( or lack thereof ). Those fan shots were for the most part complimentary, and showed at least some enthusiasm...the guy in the ref shirt with the half-cut football on his head looked like he could still have some eligibility left...he had the size. Somebody check into that...

2) Muse, Haywood, and Rogers kept a steady and finally increasing pressure on the UAB backfield. The defense did not fold in any of the situations followng turnovers, which again lends me to believe that this is a group that will win a couple of more games for SMU. The O-line for UAB was doing the close-snuggle ( read HOLDING ) on Rogers for the balance of the evening, with ultimately one call. Nevertheless, an encouraging sign that the defense continues to assert itself.

3) After all the [deleted] and moaning the last few years about missed or phantom calls that have gone against SMU, the reception/fumble and the UAB 4th down calls/no-calls were significant. That, as much as the defense swung the game, IMO. Those go the other way, and we are in deep weeds.

4) Stretch the field at least once during the game on offense....just to keep the fan interest. Givens, Sanders, even Chase could have moved the safety off the line of scrimage by throwing over the top once a half. The conservative play calling will cost SMU another game...soon.

5) Martin is still not right. He turned out away from tackles, which has not been his method when healthy. Did anyone else notice that he kept looking over to the sideline following carries ? James and Flutie both commented on the lack of aggressiveness and that there had to be problem. Mapps was steady, and had a great burst for the TD. Let DM get 100% back before he is in again.

6) Craig James will never say enough good things about SMU for his detractors, and never be photo'd enough for those that worship 32. He is what he is...a visible link on a national stage to our successful past.
I do aggree with him 100% that SMU should dominate CUSA, and have an expectation of no less than 9-3. That type of accountability will help eliminate the mediocrity that has been the expectation of SMU football.

7) Phil Bennett had complimentary things to say during halftime, and postgame, mentioning the national championship aspirations of '82-83, and making it clear that turning the corner has " taken longer than it should have." Class.

8) It was a typical, sweat-it-out SMU win. I am happier in the office this morning than I was after the ECU debacle. Life is good. Now if there were just some way to get the UTEP/NTSU/ECU games back...

Rant off.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:12 am
by ponyfan84
Good points...I love 4 and 6. I was frankly bored with the game until that 4th quarter when we made big plays, but you're right, we need to make fans interested to keep coming back (although I am sure Halloween and the cold weather kept a lot away). Go deep! Why not! There were times when the line was stuffed, and all they needed was an audible for a deep bomb/trick play! Too conservative!

As for #6, I think any true SMU fan had high hopes for the season with that schedule. I was thinking we'd do no worse than 8-4, with loses to Tech, Tulsa, Houston and a random wild card. We're 5-4, but its going to get a lot tougher. Again, there were games we should've, could've, would've won, but thats life. Luckily, we got some talented recievers, backs and QBs coming back next year. Our D is going to take a huge hit. I am not sure what the schedule looks like, but they need to schedule N. Texas @ Home, another D1-AA school to beat up on (that should be the first game, so we can get our kinks out), maybe UL-Monroe or some awful LA school, and finally maybe Baylor or Tech again.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:29 am
by OC Mustang
My two cents on the deep ball thing is that Willis' arm strength is his weakness. It is not glaring, and he can toss a ball long, but it doesn't come with that commanding "whir" as he is when he is zipping a mid-range pass over the middle or throwing to the flats. UABs corners and safeties were fast closing to the ball, which tells me they watched a lot of film. The two combined just didn't give Givens the routes to do deep.
IMHO.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:35 am
by Mustangs35SMU
ponyfan84 wrote:Luckily, we got some talented recievers, backs and QBs coming back next year. Our D is going to take a huge hit. I am not sure what the schedule looks like, but they need to schedule N. Texas @ Home, another D1-AA school to beat up on (that should be the first game, so we can get our kinks out), maybe UL-Monroe or some awful LA school, and finally maybe Baylor or Tech again.


9/01 @ Texas Tech
9/08 vs North Texas
9/15 @ Arkansas State
9/22 @ TCU
TBA vs Tulane
TBA Southern Miss
TBA Memphis
TBA UCF
TBA @ Tulsa
TBA vs Rice
TBA @ Houston
TBA vs UTEP

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:31 pm
by mavsrage311
the back end of the schedule vs. the top CUSA teams looks rough, we'll have to win a lot early and in the middle of the schedule to have a chance at a bowl next year

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:52 pm
by Peruna2001
Did we unschedule Baylor next year? I thought they were next year and Arkie State was 2008. That's what the future schedule on the front page says.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:07 pm
by ponyfan84
Ouch. Why are we @ Tech two years in a row? Thats a loss waiting to happen. With key players of our D gone, that is one brutal schedule, especially those last 4.