Page 1 of 1

Former OU QB Bomar Declared Ineligible for 2006

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:16 pm
by MrMustang1965
Anybody up for a re-match with Sam Houston State in 2007 or 2008? ;)

HUNTSVILLE, Texas -- Former Oklahoma quarterback Rhett Bomar was ruled ineligible Wednesday to play for Sam Houston State this season but will return in 2007 with two years of eligibility remaining.

Bomar and offensive lineman J.D. Quinn were kicked off the Sooners' squad in August for accepting payment for more work than they performed at a car dealership, a violation of NCAA rules.

The 6-foot-2, 215-pound Bomar transferred to Sam Houston and Quinn to Montana, both Division I-AA schools. Quinn also was ruled ineligible by the NCAA but will be allowed to play next season, Montana associate athletic director Dave Guffey said.

"I am happy to get this behind me," said Bomar, who has been allowed to practice with the Bearkats. "I look forward to having the opportunity to represent Sam Houston State. This decision today will help take the focus off me and put the focus on the team."

Bomar, from the Dallas area, was one of the nation's top recruits in 2004. He redshirted, then threw for 2,018 yards and 10 touchdowns as a freshman at Oklahoma last year.

The NCAA ordered the players to give the extra money they earned from the dealership to charities of their choice. Bomar owes $7,406.88, and Quinn owes $8,137.17.

The NCAA said the players were paid for work they said they performed during "times when they were attending class, eating dinner or at football practice."

Oklahoma also told the NCAA the student-athletes "began the practice of clocking one another in and out, dependent on who arrived first and left last each day."

In addition, the NCAA said Bomar and Quinn did not notify or receive approval from the school's compliance staff for their employment and never signed a required notification form for work during the academic year.

"Obviously, we would have liked for him to able to play in games this season," Sam Houston coach Todd Whitten said. "But, with his experience working with the squad this fall and spring training ahead next year, we look forward to having him as a Bearkat for the next two seasons."

Montana athletic director Jim O'Day said the school wouldn't have any comment on the NCAA's decision.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:10 pm
by BrianTinBigD
It is finally official! Justin Willis is a better QB than Rhett Bomar! Think how well OU would be doing if they had recruited JW, proven winner, and not the cancer from Grand Prairie that is still a proven loser.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:45 am
by mrydel
I suppose this means that Bomar couild have transferred to a 1A school and played at the same time he will be eligible for SHSU. I wonder if he is questioning his decision?

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:53 am
by MrMustang1965
mrydel wrote:I suppose this means that Bomar couild have transferred to a 1A school and played at the same time he will be eligible for SHSU. I wonder if he is questioning his decision?
His quote doesn't appear to question it. Bomar said, " "I look forward to having the opportunity to represent Sam Houston State. This decision today will help take the focus off me and put the focus on the team."

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:44 am
by me@smu
mrydel wrote:I suppose this means that Bomar couild have transferred to a 1A school and played at the same time he will be eligible for SHSU. I wonder if he is questioning his decision?


I believe he technically could still transfer to a D-1 school...you don't lose eligibility going from a D-1AA to D-1A school.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:48 am
by mrydel
me@smu wrote:
mrydel wrote:I suppose this means that Bomar couild have transferred to a 1A school and played at the same time he will be eligible for SHSU. I wonder if he is questioning his decision?


I believe he technically could still transfer to a D-1 school...you don't lose eligibility going from a D-1AA to D-1A school.


And I would bet that he does. Pure speculation on my part.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:57 am
by smu diamond m
Yea, I'd bet they'd ream him.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:59 am
by Stallion
he would still have to sit out a year because he has not yet reestablished his eligibility at Division 1A.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:02 am
by mrydel
Stallion wrote:he would still have to sit out a year because he has not yet reestablished his eligibility at Division 1A.


But isn't this the year he is sitting out? If not.......nevermind.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:05 am
by craigjames4ever
Who cares?

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:28 am
by mrydel
I do.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:42 pm
by SMU_is_bowling
I love that they are making him and J.D. pay back the money . . .that is something you don't see too often.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:44 pm
by Stallion
its standard operating procedure. All student athletes that take anything of value and are suspended must pay back that money too be reinstated.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:50 pm
by SMU_is_bowling
really? I guess I just never heard it before