Ian Johnson proposes after victory

by **J.T.supporta** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:01 am

pretty lame to me...but love is a sweet thing.

by **CalallenStang** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:01 am

What if they had lost?

by **expony18** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:04 am

by **J.T.supporta** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:05 am

He would have still done it prolly but we would have never known about it

by **MrMustang1965** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:52 am

J.T.supporta wrote:pretty lame to me...but love is a sweet thing.

Too bad the sideline reporter blew it for him by saying "And now...you want to propose to your girlfriend, right?" :roll:

by **J.T.supporta** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 2:04 am

HAHA...yea he sure did ruin it. The look on her face was priceless.

by **Mountain Mustang** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:50 am

Talk about a fairy tale/cliche. Win the game, get the girl.

She was pretty smokin too.

by **KnuckleStang** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:59 am

MrMustang1965 wrote:
J.T.supporta wrote:pretty lame to me...but love is a sweet thing.
Too bad the sideline reporter blew it for him by saying "And now...you want to propose to your girlfriend, right?"

I was amazed by that. Has to be one of the dumbest comments by a reporter ever.

by **J.T.supporta** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:22 pm

[quote="KnuckleStang"]I was amazed by that. Has to be one of the dumbest comments by a reporter ever.[/quote]

You should have expected it, the game was on FOX of all networks.

FYI, her name was Chrissy Popadics...just that Id mention it considering the last name is funny and he popped the question to Popadics.

by **PonyPride** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:05 pm

MrMustang1965 wrote:Too bad the sideline reporter blew it for him by saying "And now...you want to propose to your girlfriend, right?"

What nuclear physicist did Fox have roaming the sideline who couldn't figure out that Johnson probably wanted to bring it up himself?

I still can't believe i missed the game.

They should do away with sideline reporters altogether. I'm still waiting for just one to add something to a broadcast. Anything. To any broadcast. They're completely useless.

by **mrydel** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:26 pm

Just as a point of reference for all you liberal posters, there are bad reporters on all networks. Fox does not have a monopoly on them.

by **PonyPride** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:53 pm

Didn't mean to suggest all bad reporters work for Fox (see: Musberger, Brent).

Fox just has a bunch of awful ones, and those on the sideline -- regardless of network -- all seem completely useless.

by **J.T.supporta** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 4:11 pm

I totally agree with you PP

Ian Johnson proposes after victory

Ian Johnson proposes after victory

Re: Ian Johnson proposes after victory

Re: Ian Johnson proposes after victory

Re: Ian Johnson proposes after victory

Re: Ian Johnson proposes after victory

Who is online