me@smu wrote:Bias or not...point is that the media played up Ohio State and Michigan as being the two best teams this year. Both were beaten badly and it all became rather a joke. Next year the media will bolster someone else up as being the best.
Here's what they do EVERY year...the Big10 plays almost nobody in non-conference (with a FEW big games, like Michigan v. ND).
They always over vote their middle teams (see IOWA this year as high as #12 or so) so that when their SUPER teams like Michigan play them and WIN, well...that just SHOWS that Michigan is REALLY REALLY good...
But, Iowa didn't play anyone to deserve that ranking, and as you will recall, ND was #2 when they played - now, what in god's green earth has ND done in the past 3 years to deserve a #2 ranking?
This year, they lost 3 games, all by BLOW-OUT - not even competitive.
They had to come from behind against an average UCLA team (7-5) with an inexperienced head coach, and had the miraculous barely a victory over Michigan State (a BAD Big10 team), but, yet, they are #2?
So, again, the media votes up the Big10 opponent so that when they play, the Big10 gets 'extra' credit for a win.
Stallion points out that they are 11 and 25 or so in the past Rose Bowls, and we all know that the Pac10 has been rather weak in the past 15 years (save USC in the past 3-4).
The big10 is a fraud conference: 6 teams with losing records, and their top teams don't even play all of the top conference teams - Ohio State ONLY played Michigan and Penn State, not Purdue or Wisconsin.
Wisconsin only has 1 loss but failed to play Ohio State...where as SEC/ACC/Big12 teams with 1 loss may well have had to play the other division, and would lose a second time - Yet, wisc gets immunized and is supposedly 'better'? (example: if Florida would have lost their conference champ game - wisc would be ranked ahead of them).