PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Athletic Budgets

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Athletic Budgets

Postby Duke Blue Blood » Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:20 pm

I know there was a thread earlier about athletic budgets. While we can always use, more...take out the BCS schools and we are second...behind who? Well, our purple friends to the West.

http://www.midmajority.com/info.php?a=schools-budget

There are quite a few schools you would not expect behind us.

DBB
User avatar
Duke Blue Blood
Heisman
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby BrianTinBigD » Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:20 am

We are number 1 by over $6Mil in CUSA and Number 2 outside the BCS behind only the Horny Toads.
Class of '91
User avatar
BrianTinBigD
Heisman
 
Posts: 1421
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Allen, Texas

Postby perunapower » Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:47 am

If they would turn off the lights at Ford instead of leaving them on all the time, we might be able to cut that in half. :lol:
User avatar
perunapower
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:39 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby M Street Stang » Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:28 pm

Let's clarify this before anyone gets too excited. These are ranked by expenses, not revenue and not gross profit. I can promise you if you looked at the other side of the ledger we would not be ahead of schools like Iowa State. Just the Big 12 bowl revenue sharing alone would vault ISU way ahead of us.
M Street Stang
Scout Team
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Tx. USA

Postby Cadillac » Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:34 pm

M Street Stang wrote:Let's clarify this before anyone gets too excited. These are ranked by expenses, not revenue and not gross profit. I can promise you if you looked at the other side of the ledger we would not be ahead of schools like Iowa State. Just the Big 12 bowl revenue sharing alone would vault ISU way ahead of us.


I thought the point in showing this was to show that SMU was spending money on their athletic program, not that they were making money on it.

-CoS
User avatar
Cadillac
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:49 am
Location: McKinney

Postby Duke Blue Blood » Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:05 pm

Exactly the point. Moneyis being spent. End of Story.
User avatar
Duke Blue Blood
Heisman
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby Stallion » Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:31 pm

That is the point-money ain't the problem SMU can't excell in the lower echelons of Division 1A. Never has been as I've pointed out. The Model not money is why SMU hasn't gone bowling, been the Tournament or won championships at least in the WAC Lite and CUSA.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Postby M Street Stang » Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:40 pm

It's really hard to establish much from just a topline expense number. Does a capital expenditure for $13m towards the basketball facility count in our $32m figure? I believe Stallion posted several months ago the athletic budgets for DI schools and our budget was in the $17m range. I know we borrow from the university annually to cover the athletic deficit, but I find it hard to believe we are running a $15m gap year in and year out.
M Street Stang
Scout Team
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Tx. USA


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests