Page 1 of 3
Baylor is awful

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:37 pm
by LakeHighlandsPony
Baylor gets skunked. Is TCU that good or is Baylor just really bad. Just think what the rest of the Big 12 will do to them.
Re: Baylor is awful

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:38 pm
by expony18
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:Baylor gets skunked. Is TCU that good or is Baylor just really bad. Just think what the rest of the Big 12 will do to them.
baylor is that bad... thats why i chose smu
Re: Baylor is awful

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:38 pm
by smupony94
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:Baylor gets skunked. Is TCU that good or is Baylor just really bad. Just think what the rest of the Big 12 will do to them.
I think TCU played to the level of Baylor. It could have been much worse.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:39 pm
by expony18
absolutely... so much for those baylor players talking [deleted] all week

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:40 pm
by LakeHighlandsPony
That offense of Baylor's is really bad!

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:41 pm
by smupony94
expony18 wrote:absolutely... so much for those baylor players talking [deleted] all week
I watched and it was a boring game. TCU is going to be a tough game when we play them.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:41 pm
by FroggieFever
TCU played most of the game with their second string defense -- two top WR out -- and top RB out.
And we shut them out.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:43 pm
by expony18
FrogieFever wrote:TCU played most of the game with their second string defense -- two top WR out -- and top RB out.
And we shut them out.
and it was Baylor.... not Michigan... but congrats on the first win... i hope ya'll are undefeated when we meet up

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:43 pm
by perunapower
FrogieFever wrote:TCU played most of the game with their second string defense -- two top WR out -- and top RB out.
And we shut them out.
I hate to break it to ya, froggie, but your WR and RB had nothing to do with shutting Baylor out.


Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:43 pm
by smupony94
Too bad TCU can't beat OU before we play them

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:02 pm
by Stallion
Blake their best player didn't play either did he? TCU is that much better than Baylor. Seriously, with Blake this is one of the best defenses you'll see especially from a non-BCS school.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:04 pm
by smupony94
Stallion wrote:Blake their best player didn't play either did he? TCU is that much better than Baylor. Seriously, with Blake this is one of the best defenses you'll see especially from a non-BCS school.
No he did not so it will be a much different game then when we last played them

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:08 pm
by LakeHighlandsPony
I did not think that Dalton kid would play well his first start but he did a great job.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:36 pm
by SWC2010
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:I did not think that Dalton kid would play well his first start but he did a great job.
It's ez to play relaxed @ QB when the team you're playing can't get a 1st down... Also, IMO Morris should have been fired before the game-- any HC who can't choose his QB by K/O should be workin at the Waco Elite Cafe. Pathetic, truly pathetic.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:44 pm
by Mustang98
Bayor 0 TCU 27
That's what happens when a private school's two political alums (Ann Richards and Bob Bullock) force their way into the Big 12. If the timing were better, we would have been in the Big 12 and represented much better. We were down on our luck when the break up happend and Baylor was the most competitive of the private schools in the SWC. Richards and Bullock solidified the deal, and now they get their brains beat in every week. It's hard to recruit players to small towns unless they are compensated financially (see Texas A&M). SMU and TCU have the Metroplex to sell their recruits. I sure wish we could play that Big 12 schedule. I always feel like Baylor is such a waste on the Big 12, but every conference needs a private school to keep the books from becoming public. If only everyone knew what the super conferences were making financially. It would blow your mind.