Another Reality Check

Granted, I didn't check NY Giants' stats, but according to the broadcast of the Cowboys game, their team stats looked a little like SMU on the offensive side of the ball. Defense gave up 35...10 pt difference instead of 14 pts, but result was same. Now I don't like giving up ridiculous passing yards to an opposing team either, but a win is a win.
As for Ark State, before we get completely tweaked about the team's/coach's shortcomings, lets take a look at the matchup. Clearly, they played up to Texas. But let's not kid each other, they are not Div I-AA 2x National Champions Appalachian State. They played up to Texas because they didn't have anything to lose. Texas didn't care...period. They tend to start slow as well, do they not? If I recall the last few years, if it hadn't been for Vince Young, Texas might never have completed an undefeated season for starting slow.
Does this SMU team have to take this Ark State game uber-seriously? I guess this question is as dumba$$ a question as could ever be asked, even rhetorically, given what we have seen from the last two games.
However, I think the these questions also have to be asked: is Ark State better than Tech? Are they better than UNT? Personally, I think the answer is "no, and maybe erring toward no", respectively.
If anybody (PPride, that's you, man) can show us an offensive and defensive matchup analysis, I'd like to see exactly what Ark State has before I start ripping SMU's chances this weekend. We've covered the intangibles ad nauseum.
SMU won. I personally don't care how ugly it got in doing so; it got my blood pumping. Boise State beat OU on gimmick plays; I betcha their fans would not have questioned the stats on that game. They won...period. And it was arguably the best game I have ever seen.
As for Ark State, before we get completely tweaked about the team's/coach's shortcomings, lets take a look at the matchup. Clearly, they played up to Texas. But let's not kid each other, they are not Div I-AA 2x National Champions Appalachian State. They played up to Texas because they didn't have anything to lose. Texas didn't care...period. They tend to start slow as well, do they not? If I recall the last few years, if it hadn't been for Vince Young, Texas might never have completed an undefeated season for starting slow.
Does this SMU team have to take this Ark State game uber-seriously? I guess this question is as dumba$$ a question as could ever be asked, even rhetorically, given what we have seen from the last two games.
However, I think the these questions also have to be asked: is Ark State better than Tech? Are they better than UNT? Personally, I think the answer is "no, and maybe erring toward no", respectively.
If anybody (PPride, that's you, man) can show us an offensive and defensive matchup analysis, I'd like to see exactly what Ark State has before I start ripping SMU's chances this weekend. We've covered the intangibles ad nauseum.
SMU won. I personally don't care how ugly it got in doing so; it got my blood pumping. Boise State beat OU on gimmick plays; I betcha their fans would not have questioned the stats on that game. They won...period. And it was arguably the best game I have ever seen.