Page 1 of 2

Same old SMU................

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:36 pm
by PonySnob
Another season of the same old BS of the last 20 years! We need football players who happen to be students........not students who happen to be football players...............

Re: Same old SMU................

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:51 pm
by bigdaddy08091
PonySnob wrote:Another season of the same old BS of the last 20 years! We need football players who happen to be students........not students who happen to be football players...............


I said it a thousand times! Coaching is not the issue. We just dont do the things on the field that good teams do.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:52 pm
by PonyKai
Umm...which is because of coaching?

Re: Same old SMU................

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:52 pm
by PonySnob
bigdaddy08091 wrote:I said it a thousand times! Coaching is not the issue. We just dont do the things on the field that good teams do.


That's why we need football players who happen to be students.....not students who happen to be football players!!

Re: Same old SMU................

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:55 pm
by RGV Pony
bigdaddy08091 wrote:
PonySnob wrote:Another season of the same old BS of the last 20 years! We need football players who happen to be students........not students who happen to be football players...............


I said it a thousand times! Coaching is not the issue. We just dont do the things on the field that good teams do.


Tell me, exactly who is it that is responsible for acquiring football players that happen to be students?

Re: Same old SMU................

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:56 pm
by expony18
RGV Pony wrote:
bigdaddy08091 wrote:
PonySnob wrote:Another season of the same old BS of the last 20 years! We need football players who happen to be students........not students who happen to be football players...............


I said it a thousand times! Coaching is not the issue. We just dont do the things on the field that good teams do.


Tell me, exactly who is it that is responsible for acquiring football players that happen to be students?
boosters paying players

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:07 pm
by bigdaddy08091
Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:Umm...which is because of coaching?


We need playmakers. What D1 school consistently has the QB as the leading rusher, while gettin the [deleted] beat out of him. How many balls were dropped? Two of them were TD's. And the D. There is only so much coaching you can do.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:09 pm
by PonySnob
we need Division 1 football players..............

Re: Same old SMU................

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:09 pm
by bigdaddy08091
expony18 wrote:
RGV Pony wrote:
bigdaddy08091 wrote:
PonySnob wrote:Another season of the same old BS of the last 20 years! We need football players who happen to be students........not students who happen to be football players...............


I said it a thousand times! Coaching is not the issue. We just dont do the things on the field that good teams do.


Tell me, exactly who is it that is responsible for acquiring football players that happen to be students?
boosters paying players


Admin! Changing test scores and such!

Re: Same old SMU................

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:10 pm
by thefamousguy
bigdaddy08091 wrote:
PonySnob wrote:Another season of the same old BS of the last 20 years! We need football players who happen to be students........not students who happen to be football players...............


I said it a thousand times! Coaching is not the issue. We just dont do the things on the field that good teams do.


You're wrong when you don't do the correct things on the field it's because of poor coaching. We don't have the nation's Best athletes but we have better athletes than our record will suggest at the end of another Losing season. :(

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:11 pm
by jkflamebo
if you've talked to the players and heard their view like i have, the problem is within the coaches gentlemen. sure u could blame the athleticism of individual players. if we got a legit head coach, you would see games like today disappear

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:16 pm
by MrMustang1965
jkflamebo wrote:if you've talked to the players and heard their view like i have, the problem is within the coaches gentlemen. sure u could blame the athleticism of individual players. if we got a legit head coach, you would see games like today disappear
Sounds like Orsini needs to call Roto Rooter.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:18 pm
by RGV Pony
jkflamebo wrote:if you've talked to the players and heard their view like i have, the problem is within the coaches gentlemen. sure u could blame the athleticism of individual players. if we got a legit head coach, you would see games like today disappear


one of the players, however, says if PB goes he goes. Kind of like Kelly to the girl in Bad News Bears about wearing a cup.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:20 pm
by PonySnob
RGV Pony wrote:one of the players, however, says if PB goes he goes. Kind of like Kelly to the girl in Bad News Bears about wearing a cup.


well the new coach would probably want his own QB anyways ...............and if that player is a certain QB.....his timely fumble did not help the outcome of the game tonight.........

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:25 pm
by MrMustang1965
RGV Pony wrote:one of the players, however, says if PB goes he goes.
That comment was made last year.