Bennett = 0-3 versus the spread
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:26 pmHe couldn't cover the spread if he was holding Miracle Whip while he was at a tea party!
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:26 pmPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:29 pmand thank you Norm Hitzges.
Re: Bennett = 0-3 versus the spread
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:17 pmponygrad90 wrote:He couldn't cover the spread if he was holding Miracle Whip while he was at a tea party!
That was so funny that is it wasn't even funny anymore.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:21 pmLighten up with the witch hunt. Teams cover or don't cover, and teams win or lose -- not one player and not one coach.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:15 pmtell my wife that I've blown my account and we are only in week 3
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:51 pmWRONG! PB has forgotten more about Miracle Whip than anyone this board knows...
Re: Bennett = 0-3 versus the spread
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:54 pmponygrad90 wrote:He couldn't cover the spread if he was holding Miracle Whip while he was at a tea party!
Since his goal isn't to win, but to help people who bet on SMU
Come on now