Stanford at USC
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:23 pmStanford on USC 9 with 1:39 left down 17-23.
TOUCHDOWN STANFORD!!!
24-23
No USC timeouts. 49 seconds left.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:23 pmPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:29 pmPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:32 pmStanford's sophmore QB has been veryyyyyyy impressive! Only 45 seconds left!
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:35 pmSTANFORD WINS!!! Booty gets his 4th pick!!
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:42 pmAt least USC, a private school, lost to Stanford, another private school. I ALWAYS root for the private schools to beat the big, state, TAXPAYER supported schools. Notre Dame is usually the exception, but given all their losses this year, I will even root for them.
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:43 pmwow
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:53 pmSo Stanford hires a coach who beats the #1 team in the nation with the last coachs crappy players. So Coaching does matter?!!
Go Stanford!! Beat the Frogs!
Go Stanford!! Beat the Frogs!
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:16 pmSomeone tell me what Stanford's "model" is.
I guess Schwartzstein won't be changing his commitment.
I guess Schwartzstein won't be changing his commitment.
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:43 amBiggest upset of the year?
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:47 pmI think this is much bigger than Michigan losing to Appl State!
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:54 pmUNT losing to SMUponyfan84 wrote:Biggest upset of the year?
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:14 pmRGV Pony wrote:Someone tell me what Stanford's "model" is.
I guess Schwartzstein won't be changing his commitment.
One thing is for certain...Stanford's model involves not having to sell a TOP 10 academic environment. It is more attractive than SMU in every scenario one would sell to a prospective Texas recruit except maybe having one's parents able to come to games regularly. I don't know about the "talent" (girls) there, so I am not rating that.
Not saying SMU is anything to sneeze at, but comparatively, SMU can't hold Stanford's academic jock.
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:36 pmOC Mustang wrote:I don't know about the "talent" (girls) there, so I am not rating that.
Lots of Asians. And fugly white girls.
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:42 pmSMUtrojanFAN wrote:OC Mustang wrote:I don't know about the "talent" (girls) there, so I am not rating that.
Lots of Asians. And fugly white girls.
ehhh cannot agree with you there. there's talent