Navy v. Pitt
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:55 pm4th qtr. navy runs a fake punt up 35-31.... 3 plays later TD Pitt 35-38, it's a track meet...
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:55 pmPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:07 pmYay!
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:33 pmYeah, Navy tackles the way we do. 
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:38 pmhow stupid is their DT, hold them to 3 and out and you line up in the neutral zone on the FG
edit: leads to a TD!
edit: leads to a TD!
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:42 pmgreat playing calling... first play, is play action by navy for a TD 45-45 pending review
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:57 pm4th ang goal on the 2.... pitt throws a fade.... yikes!
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:06 pmDid anyone else see the Stuart Scott Poetry Jam on SportsCenter? I thought the "Who's Now" segment was bad, but this was worse. Much worse.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:18 amEven Stallion can admit SMU has better talent than Navy.
NO way PB could coach SMU to a win over Pitt. Pitt is injured but their talent, depth and size beats Navy across the board.
What gives? And for all the Paul Johnson/tripple option nay sayers Navy beat Pitt with the pass multiple times.
NO way PB could coach SMU to a win over Pitt. Pitt is injured but their talent, depth and size beats Navy across the board.
What gives? And for all the Paul Johnson/tripple option nay sayers Navy beat Pitt with the pass multiple times.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:53 amthe option is tough. once you start guessing you screw yourself for the entire game
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:57 amNavy gave up 43 points to Duke
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:06 amWannstadt is an idiot. Navy leading by a field goal in overtime, and Pitt goes for a TD on 4th down. You tie the game and go to the next round, I guess Wannstadt forgot that.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:44 ami don't think that was necessarily a bad call... what i think was the bad call was the fade... when you have been running all over Navy. on 3rd down on the 3 they should have ran the ball, and then ran it again on 4th...EastStang wrote:Wannstadt is an idiot. Navy leading by a field goal in overtime, and Pitt goes for a TD on 4th down. You tie the game and go to the next round, I guess Wannstadt forgot that.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:54 amNavy always plays exciting games under Johnson and the guy flat out wins with little talent. He's impressive-can Orsini pulls some magic and entice him here?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:56 amit tears me apart inside on this issue. being from pittsburgh, i like dave for all he did while playing at pitt and like the guy. however, he hasnt done jack with a program that was consistently able to compete for Big East titles year in and year out
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:57 amWhoever said in another thread that Johnson would throw the ball more if he had the players is kidding himself. The guy has run offenses since the mid 80's and run basically the same offense.
I know Johnson may have said that, but it is like Don Nelson saying his teams play no defense because he has no defensive players and has no center. After years and years of evidence, coach, at some point it stops being about the players and starts being about you.
Johnson runs that offense because that is the offense he wants to run.
I know Johnson may have said that, but it is like Don Nelson saying his teams play no defense because he has no defensive players and has no center. After years and years of evidence, coach, at some point it stops being about the players and starts being about you.
Johnson runs that offense because that is the offense he wants to run.