At this point in the season? Who is the team MVP?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:18 pmAt this point in the season? Who is the team MVP?
PonyFans.com
SMU Fan Site
http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/
At this point in the season? Who is the team MVP?
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:18 pmPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:19 pmMorestead-I'm serious
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:19 pmJustin Willis
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:23 pmStallion wrote:Morestead-I'm serious
Coming from someone who doesn't want to use him, that's just funny.
why kick?? GO FOR IT!!!!
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:26 pmPal-3 points gets you to 5 and gives Tulsa the ball about 70 yards from a victory. Tulsa already proved they could go 99 starting in the shadows of their end zone in 1:11. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:28 pmStallion wrote:Pal-3 points gets you to 5 and gives Tulsa the ball about 70 yards from a victory. Tulsa already proved they could go 99 starting in the shadows of their end zone in 1:11. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
I gotta agree with Stallion on this one. Going for it was the right call, but there should have been NO CHANCE that we did not make in on 3 tries. One call should have at least gone to Willis on a bootleg or keeper play.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:35 pmSteve Orsini
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:36 pmA) if you go for it, go for it! Put the QB under center and sneak it on third. If unsuccessful, run a hurry up and sneak it again.
B) It is very hard to say an outcome, given a specific set of circumstances, will be the same, given an entirely different set of circumstances. If the mindset is that they need 6, not just 3, then you play defense differently - no? Yes. All teams are capable of going to the house on us at any time, so force them into needing the TD. I submit that there is a high probability that, had we gone up 10 (with 2pt), we would have found a way to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory."
C) We should have kicked on 4th and 2 earlier in the quarter to make it a 2 possession game. That would have changed everything and this conversation would be completely different.
D) This is simply a strategy conversation and we can disagree.
E) lets capitalize on this opportunity to make a great hire and get moving forward again. What is getting lost in this argument is how much potential we showed yesterday - the future should be bright
B) It is very hard to say an outcome, given a specific set of circumstances, will be the same, given an entirely different set of circumstances. If the mindset is that they need 6, not just 3, then you play defense differently - no? Yes. All teams are capable of going to the house on us at any time, so force them into needing the TD. I submit that there is a high probability that, had we gone up 10 (with 2pt), we would have found a way to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory."
C) We should have kicked on 4th and 2 earlier in the quarter to make it a 2 possession game. That would have changed everything and this conversation would be completely different.
D) This is simply a strategy conversation and we can disagree.
E) lets capitalize on this opportunity to make a great hire and get moving forward again. What is getting lost in this argument is how much potential we showed yesterday - the future should be bright
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:37 pmponygrad90 wrote:Steve Orsini
Nuts, you stole my punch line....
Orsini, for firing PB!
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:43 pmThis is for the Magnolia League team MVPs. Do you want me to post your AD? I will.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:44 pmmagnolialeague wrote:This is for the Magnolia League team MVPs. Do you want me to post your AD? I will.
Why don't you just post your own name. You have our permission.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:49 pmBRStang wrote:magnolialeague wrote:This is for the Magnolia League team MVPs. Do you want me to post your AD? I will.
Why don't you just post your own name. You have our permission.
I don't get it. Are you confusing me with someone else?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:53 pmmagnolialeague wrote: I don't get it.
Yeah. That's an understatement.
magnolialeague wrote: Are you confusing me with someone else?
No, it's just that no one cares about your website or the magnolia deal.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:57 pmBRStang wrote:magnolialeague wrote: I don't get it.
Yeah. That's an understatement.magnolialeague wrote: Are you confusing me with someone else?
No, it's just that no one cares about your website or the magnolia deal.
Oh, you are a funny guy. My bad. I didn't recognize your talent.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:59 pmThomas Morestead had a greater effect on yesterday's game than just about any player on either team. Tulsa started their drives at what their own 17 yard line(after the last one started at the 1 it may have been less). SMU started their drives well upfield because of field position and turnovers. 3 kicks inside the 20. It was a Classic field position game and Morestead is a real weapon.